Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24451 (AP)

Borigorla Thirupathaiah v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

CRLP/7141/2025 · 2025-08-05

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

•`. \ `\q*`\ APHCO10345652025 EELE IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI TUESDAY, THE TWELFTH DAY OFAUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO I.A.No.3 of 2025 CRIMINAL ln PETITION No.7141 of 2025 Between: 1. Borigorla Thirupathaiah, s/o peral-ah, Aged 57 years, Occ.-Farmer, R/o Vagumadugu village, Konakanamitia Mandal, Prakasam District 2| Sada.m Veera`ia.h Sac!am. Pedda \./eeraiah, S/a.Kasaiah, Aged 60 \JJealrS, Occ.- Farmer, R/o.3-37, Vagumadugu Village, Konakanamitia MandaI, Prakasam District. 3. Sadam Chinna Veeraiah, S/o Chennaiah, Age 60 years, Occ: Farmer, R/o 1-92, Vagumadugu village, RegadI'Palli Mandal, Prakasam District. ..IPetitioners/Accused Nos`.8, 9 & 10 AND The State ofAndhra Pradesh, Rep. by The Station House Officer, Podili Police Station, Prakasam District, Andhra Pradesh, Through the Public Prosecutor, High Court ofAndhra Pradesh. ...Respondent/Complainant Petition under section 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in th,e Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to post the matter under For Being Mentioned caption and to correct the inadvertent error by substituting {{Additional District Judge, E| Markapur" in para 8 of the order dated o6.08.2025 in CrI.P.No,7141 of 2025, jn place of [fJudicial MagI-Strafe of Fl-rst class, Podilr. counsel for the Petjtjoners .I srj velurI-Bharat surender Reddy Counsel for the Respondent : public prosecutor The court made the following order: ff The present applicat][on js fj[ed seeking modjficat]-on of order dated o6-08-2025 jn Crf-mI-hal Petf-lion No. 7141 of 2025. 2. Heard- 3| ln partI-al modifI-Call-On Of Para No. 8 of the order dated o6-08-2025 I-n CrimI-hal PetI-lion No. 7141 of 2O25, the petitioners-accused Mos. 8 to 10 are granted liberty to f[IIe appropriate appljcatI-On for theJ-I enlargement on baf[] before the competent court on or ~hefolre J2IC-08-2025 ancI- On Such application, reamed sessI-OnS Judge/AddI-tI-Onal SessI-OnS Judge is directed to consider Et on I-ts OWn merits and dispose of the same in accordance wl-th law within a period of two (2) days by duly giving oPPOrtunI-ty to learned public prosecutor. 4. The applicatllOn is accordI-ngly allowed". //TRUE COPY// ASSSIdS/+BAg#AAg SECTION OFFICER To 1. The AddI|tI-Onal Dl's{rf-ct Judge, Markapur, prakasam District.(BY SPEED POST) 2. The Judic[-aI Magistrate of FI-rSt Class, podjli, prakasam DI-Strl-Ct. 3. The Slat,-on House officer, podili police slat,Ion, prakasam DI'StriCt. I- \\ _.'`,-`"I_ TK Vna 4. Two CCs to the Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh, Amarava{hi[OUT] 5. One CC to SrI-Veluri Bharat Surender Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 6. Two CD Copies t|' ~. i ` i.I :I I. I.: .+-. I., =.-.,.,3 `~-| ^| I,.-..I,.I .. •'+i HIGH COURT DATED: 12/08/2025 ORDER I.A.No.3 of 2025 in CRLP No.7141 of 2025 ALLOWING THE APPLICATION