1^ APHC010345392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH v/ AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE vX' PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N vx WRIT PETITION NO: 17284 OF 2025 0®^ '>X' vX Between: v K. Mallikarjunav^, S/o. K. Seshaiah Age- 50 Remaduru(V), Kallur(M), Kurnool (Dis), A.P(State)-518463 yrs, Occ- Business, R/o. 2-43, ...Petitioner \X AND 1. The Statejf Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary Department, Kurnool District x'" 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool District, 3. The Station House Officer, Ulindakonda Kurnool District. lX Home Police Station, Kallur(M) \x 4. Path^nti Pedha Sunkanna, S/o. Peddinti Pedha Lingan"?^, Remaduru Village, Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh 5. Pathainti Bazdr^nna, S/o. - 518463.'^ Peddinti Pedha Linganna, Remaduru Village j-518463. x- Peddinti Pedha Linganna, Remaduru Village, Kallur Mandal Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh - 518463. Kallur Mandal, Kurnool District, Andhra Pradesh 6. Pathainti Kullanna, S/o. ...RespondentV India praying that in the Petition under Article 226'^ the Constitution of circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction a declaring action of the 3rd respondent in repeatedly calling the petitioner to k. the police station as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 19,21,22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to Summon the petitioner to the police station and violate the petitioners free movement. lA NO: 1 OF 202^ Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit fiied in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3™ respondent noHo cali the petitioner to the police station without following due process of law. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI KARUMANCHI DHEERAJ REDDV" Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3: GP FOR HOME.^ Counsel for the Respondent Nos. 4 to 6: The Court made the following order: APHC010345392025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17284/2025 Between: S/0. K. SESHAIAH AGE- 50 YRS, OCC- KURNOOL 1.K. MALLIKARJUNAYYA, BUSINESS (DIS), A.P(STATE)-518463 R/0. 2-43,REMADURU(V), KALLUR(M), ...PETITIONER AND 1.THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, KURNOOL DISTRICT 2.THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 3.THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, ULINDAKONDA POLICE STATION, KALLUR(M) KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4.PATHAINTI PEDHA SUNKANNA, S/0. PEDDINTI PEDHA LINGANNA, REMADURU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 518463. 5.PATHAINTI BAZARANNA, S/0. PEDDINTI PEDHA LINGANNA, REMADURU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 518463. 6.PATHAINTI PULLANNA, S/0. PEDDINTI PEDHA LINGANNA, REMADURU VILLAGE, KALLUR MANDAL KURNOOL DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 518463. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased tomay be pleased to issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ or direction declaring action of the 3rd respondent in repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station as illegal, arbitrary, one without jurisdiction and violative of Article 19,21,22 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the 3rd respondent not to Summon the petitioner the police station and violate the petitioners free movement and to pass lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased may be pleased to direct the 3 respondent not to call the petitioner to the police station without following due process of law and Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.KARUMANCHI DHEERAJ REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1.GP FOR HOME pass 3 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 3'^'^ respondent at behest of respondents 4 to 6 is repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the illegal claims of respondents 4 to 6. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant 2. Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 3. Considering the same, the 3 respondent is hereby directed not 3. to interfere in the civil disputes, if any pending, between the petitioner and the respondents 4 to 6. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 4. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. 5. Sd/- M.PRABHAKAR RAO ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// r 9^ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal Secretary, Home Department, Velagapudi, Amaravathi Guntur District. 2. The Superintendent of Police, Kurnool'bistrict. 3. The Station House Officer, Ulindakon'Sa Police Kurnool District. 4. One CC to Sri Karumanchi oheeraj Reddy, Advocate [OPUC] 5. Two CCs to GP for Home, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 6. Two CD Copies Station, Kallur(M) TF HIGH COURT DATED: 10/07/2025 ORDER WP NO. 17284 OF 2025 t« JUL 2025 )S j^sQifTentSectionxyy o DISPOSING OF THE W.P., WITHOUT COSTS