Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010345682014
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] THURSDAY ,THE TENTH DAY OF APRIL TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 381/2014 Between: Kalapala Ramesh ...PETITIONER AND Kalapala Suneetha Another and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. RAMANA ALLU Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) The Court made the following:
JUDGMENT:
Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks time. However, the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the main Maintenance Case in M.C.No.255 of 2012 was dismissed for default on 14.09.2015 and requested to dismiss the case as infructuous. A perusal of the e-Courts case status information, it is obvious that M.C.No.255 of 2012 was dismissed on 14.09.2015 for default.
2. In view of the dismissal of main Maintenance Case i.e., M.C.No.255 of 2012 on 14.09.2015 by the learned Judge, Family Court-cum-IV Additional District & Sessions Judge, Vijayawada, nothing remains in this Revision Case for further adjudication.
3. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.
As a sequel, interlocutory applications, if any pending, shall stand closed. _________________________ DR. Y. LAKSHMANA RAO, J. Date: 10.04.2025 sj
146
THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO
CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 381 of 2014
Date: 10.04.2025 sj