APHC010345222025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3457] THURSDAY,THE TENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 17251/2025 Between: 1. ALLAPARTHI BAPANAIAH, S/O. NAGESWARARAO, AGED 44 YEARS, R/O. TELEPHONE COLONY, ROAD NO.2, R.K.PURAM, KOTHAPET, HYDERABAD-500035. PERMANENT R/O. DOOR.NO.21-16/A, ALLAPARU POST, NAGARAM MANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTEND OF POLICE, REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, REPALLE, BAPATLA DISTRICT. 5. KATTUPALLI KOTESWARA RAO, , S/O. SUBBARAO OCC MANAGER, AURABINDO PHARMA, IV TH UNIT (R AND D) PASHAMYLARAM, SANGAREDDY DISTRICT. PERMANENT R/O. 2- 222, NEAR HANUMAN TEMPLE NAGARAM POST AND MANDAL, BAPATIA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue any writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in harassing the petitioner by calling him to the police station frequently and resorting to extra judicial settlement of civil dispute by making him to sit till night is illegal, arbitrary and violation of article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and to consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner and to consequently direct the respondents to restrain from harassing the petitioner any manner and further direct the 2nd respondent to initiate action against the 3rd and 4th respondents for misusing their official powers for extra judicial settlements and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct the respondents not to harass the petitioner by calling him to the police station for the purpose of settlement of the civil dispute by interfering with their personal liberty pending disposal of the writ petition and to pass s Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. V V SATISH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 The Court made the following Order: Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the 4th respondent at behest of 5th respondent is repeatedly calling the petitioner to the police station and pressurizing the petitioner to settle the dispute with 5th respondent. It is submitted that the petitioner and the 5th respondent have some financial transactions and the police without any authority are interfering in the said civil dispute. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, appearing for the respondents 1 to 4. 3. Considering the same, the 4th respondent is hereby directed not to disturb the peace of the petitioner, without following due process of law. It is made clear that the police shall not interfere in the civil dispute pending between the petitioner and the 5th respondent. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs. 5. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________ JUSTICE HARINATH.N Date : 10.07.2025 BMS