MANAV VIKASH SIKSHA SAMITI FATEHPUR AND ANOTHER v. UNION OF INDIA AND 4 OTHERS
WRIC/6351/2025 · 2025-03-04
Ashwani Kumar Mishra, Donadi Ramesh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24440 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24440 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:31878-DB Court No. - 29 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6351 of 2025 Petitioner :- Manav Vikash Siksha Samiti Fatehpur And Another Respondent :- Union Of India And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Rajesh Kumar Srivastava,Saurabh Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- A.S.G.I.,C.S.C. Hon'ble Ashwani Kumar Mishra,J. Hon'ble Donadi Ramesh,J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This writ petition has been filed by the petitioner seeking following relief:
"I- to call for records and to issue writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding respondent authorities to release the payment due to the petitioner society for conducting especial training center from 17.10.2019 t 15.10.2021 with interest; II- issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 23.08.2024 made by the petitioner (contained as Annexure No. 7 to this writ petition), within stipulated period as fixed by this Hon'ble Court."
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that since an identical matter has been considered and disposed of by this Court vide order dated 15.03.2024, passed in Writ-C No. 8633 of 2024 (Amar Shahid Paramveer Chakra Jadunath Singh Jan Kalyan Sewa Sansthan & 4 others Vs. Union of India & 4 others), the present petition may also be decided in terms of the aforesaid
order. The said order dated 15.03.2024 is being quoted hereunder:
"1. Heard Shri Anuj Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Arimardan Singh Rajput, learned A.C.S.C. for the State-respondents and Shri Abrar Ahmed, learned counsel for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
2. At the outset, Shri Anuj Bajpai, learned counsel for the petitioner states, the present petition be confined on behalf of the petitioner no.1 only. Accordingly, he is permitted to delete petitioner nos. 2 to 5 from the array of the parties with liberty to those petitioners to file separate petition/s.
3. Solitary grievance of the petitioner is, Rs. 3,25,822/- is due and payable to
the petitioner. Reference has been made to the Enquiry Report dated 28.12.2023 submitted by respondent no.5. Prima facie, it does appear, the amount is admitted. Thus, no useful purpose would be served in keeping the present petition pending or calling for counter affidavit at this stage.
4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of with the direction, subject to the petitioner filing a copy of this order before respondent no.4, the said respondent may take due action on the claim made, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one month from the date of compliance shown. If the claim or any part thereof is to be declined, adequate reasons for the same may be communicated to the petitioner within the same time. Admitted amount, if any, may be paid out within a further period of one month. Failing that compliance, admitted amount shall attract interest @ 8% from the date of amount becoming due till the date of actual payment."
4. Additionally, it is further pointed out that earlier the petitioner has approached this Court along with above quoted order, his name was permitted to be deleted by this Court for the purpose of filing a separate petition, hence this petition.
5. Learned counsel for the respondents could not dispute the same.
6. Accordingly, the present petition is disposed of in terms of the aforesaid order dated 15.03.2024 passed in Writ-C No. 8633 of 2024 (Amar Shahid Paramveer Chakra Jadunath Singh Jan Kalyan Sewa Sansthan & 4 others Vs. Union of India & 4 others).
Order Date :- 5.3.2025 Shiraz Digitally signed by :- SHIRAZ ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad