Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24433 (KAR)

MR K N VENKATASWAMY REDDY v. K M SRINIVASA REDDY S/O LATE K C MUNIREDDY DEAD

RFA/436/2010 · 2025-06-27

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22732 RFA No. 436 of 2010 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 27TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 436 OF 2010 (PAR) BETWEEN: MR K N VENKATASWAMY REDDY S/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS R/AT NO.27, CHELOCARE VILLAGE LOKESH REDDY LAYOUT KALYAN NGAR, BANGALORE-560043. …APPELLANT (BY SRI.K N VENKATASWAMY REDDY APPELLANT (ABSENT)) AND: 1. K M SRINIVASA REDDY S/O LATE K C MUNIREDDY DEAD BY LR’ S. 1(A) SMT PARVATHAMMA W/O LATE K M SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 1(B) K S SRIDHAR S/O LATE K M SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 38 YEARS Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22732 RFA No. 436 of 2010 1(C) SMT K S ANUPAMA W/O VENKATESH REDDY D/O LATE K M SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS. 1(D) K S PRAKASH S/O LATE K M SRINIVASA REDDY AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R1(A) TO (D) ARE R/A PATTABHI NILAYA OPP. DURGACONDIMENTS (NEAR POORVIKA WINES)9TH MAIN VANGASANDRA-GARVEBHAVIPALYA ROAD B VANGASANDRA, BANGALORE-68. 2. K C NARASIMHA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKA YELLAPPA AGED ABOUT 83 YEARS SINCE DEAD BY LRS 2(A) SMT KAUSALYAMMA W/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY AGED 71 YEARS NO.3B, MARUTHINAGAR KAIONDANAHALLI,BANGALORE-85. 2(B) K N SHANKARAPPA S/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS NO.3, 8TH BLOCK KORAMANGALA,BANGALORE-95. 2(C) K N RAMAREDDY S/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS NO.31/B, 8TH BLOCK,OPP. POLICE STATION,KORAMANGALA BANGALORE-95. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22732 RFA No. 436 of 2010 2(D) K N GURUMURTHY REDDY S/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS NO.38, MARUTHI NAGAR BANGALORE-85 2(E) K N MANJUNATH REDDY S/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS NO.100, KARAM VALLEY, BANGALORE-95. 2(F) K N LAKSHMIKANTH S/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS NO.36, PUTTENAHALLIJ.P.NAGAR 7TH CROSS, BANGALORE-78. 2(G) K N PADMAVATHI D/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY DODDAKANELLI, CHARMALARAM POST BANGALORE-35. 2(H) K N BHARATHI D/O LATE K C NARASIMHA REDDY NO.1185, ARALINAGAR POST ATMANANDA COLONY,4TH CROSS BANGALORE-32. 3. K C NAGAPPA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKAYELLEPPA AGED ABOUT 80 YEARS 4. K C CHIKKAMUNIREDDY S/O LATE CHIKKAYELLEPPA AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22732 RFA No. 436 of 2010 5. K C MUNIYAPPA REDDY S/O LATE CHIKKAYELLEPPA AGED ABOUT 77 YEARS RESPONDENTS NOS.3,4 & 5 ARE R/OF KORAMANGALA VILLAGE BEGURU HOBLI, BANGALORE SOUTH TALUK BANGALORE-560 034. 6. SRI K P SUDHEENDRA S/O K C PAPANNA 42 YEARS 7. SRINIVASA REDDY S/O VENKATASWAMY REDDY AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS 427, IST CROSS, IST MAIN KPC LAYOUT, KASAVANAHALLI BANGALORE-35. 8. G RAVI ACHARYA S/O GIVNID ACHARYA AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS R/AT 17/1, BELANDUR GATE AMBALIPURA SARJAPUR ROAD AGARA, BANGALORE-34. 9. SMT MEENAKASHMAMMA W/O LATE K C PAPANNA SINCE DEAD BY LRS RESPONDENTS NO.6 10 & 11 HEREIN. 10. K P CHANDRASHEKARA REDDY S/O LATE K C PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS - 5 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22732 RFA No. 436 of 2010 11. K P MADHAVA REDDY S/O LATE K C PAPANNA AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS R6,10 & 11 ARE R/AT NO.9, JAKKASANDRA KORAMANGALA, IST BLOCK BANGALORE-34. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.DILEEP N ADVOCATE FOR R8) THIS RFA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 96 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 17.12.2009 PASSED IN O.S.NO.16442/2005 ON THE FILE OF THE XXVIII ADDL. CITY CIVIL JUDGE, MAYOHALL UNIT, BANGALORE, DISMISSING THE SUIT FOR PARTITION, DECLARATION & PERMANENT INJUNCTION. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD ORAL JUDGMENT This court by order dated 02.12.2024 had permitted the learned counsel for the appellant to retire from the case and directed the office to show the name of the appellant in the cause list and also granted time to the appellant to engage new counsel till the next date of hearing, failing which, the appeal will be dismissed. - 6 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC:22732 RFA No. 436 of 2010 Today, when the matter was called out, none appeared for the appellant. The appellant has also not engaged the services of any counsel. It appears that the appellant is not interested in prosecuting the case. Hence, in view of the order dated 02.12.2024, the appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 1