Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24431 (KAR)

SMT.PREMALATHA v. SRI.RAJANNA

WP/10271/2021 · 2025-04-15

H T Narendra Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15545 WP No. 10271 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO. 10271 OF 2021 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. SMT.PREMALATHA W/O LATE SRI. A. MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS 2. SMT. M. ANITHA D/O LATE A. MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS 3. SMT. M. ASHWINI D/O LATE. A. MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS 4. MR. M. AKASH S/O LATE. A. MAHALINGAPPA AGED ABOUT 25 YEARS ALL ARE RESIDING AT GOVINDAIAHNAPALYA MANTANA KURCHI DHAKALE KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK- 560123 BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. HARSHA KUMAR GOWDA H R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. SRI.RAJANNA DEAD BY LR’S SMT. PUTTAMMA Digitally signed by HEMALATHA A Location: HIGH COURTOF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15545 WP No. 10271 of 2021 W/O LATE. SRI. RAJANNA MAJOR, 2. MR. MAHESH.R S/O LATE SRI. RAJANNA AGED ABOUT 29 YEARS BOTH ARE RESIDING AT GEDDALAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- 562111. 3. SMT. RASHMI D/O LATE RAJANNA W/O MR. RAVI. AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS R/AT BORAMARANAHALLI VILLAGE KASABA HOBLI, NELAMANGALA TALUK BENGALURU RURAL DISTRICT- 562123. …RESPONDENTS (NOTICE TO R1 & R2 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED NOTICE TO R3 IS HELD SUFFICIENT) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR THE RECORD IN THE TRIAL COURT OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC NELAMANGALA, BANGALORE RURAL IN EX. PETITION NO.15/2015, INCLUDING THE IMPUGNED ORDER OF THE SAID COURT DATED 27.12.2019 AS PER ANNEXURE-A VERIFYING THE FACTUAL CORRECTNESS AND LEGALITY OF THE SAME AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15545 WP No. 10271 of 2021 ORAL ORDER 1. The learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo stating that the writ petition may be dismissed as having become infructuous on the ground that the execution petition itself has been disposed of on 14.10.2024. 2. The memo is placed on record. 3. Accordingly, the petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (H.T. NARENDRA PRASAD) JUDGE DM LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 1