APHC010345812003 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3332] THURSDAY,THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE RAVI CHEEMALAPATI WRIT PETITION NO: 7940/2003 Between: 1. DR.CH.P.SATYANARAYANA, S/O. CH. VEERAIAH, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS OCC READER, HEAD OF THE DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF RESEARCH AND PUBLICATIONS, RESHTRIYA SANKIRTA VIDYAPEETHA, TIRUPATHI, R/O. TIRUPATHI. 2. DR.M.S.R.SUBRAHMANYA SARMA,, S/O. M.GURU MURTHY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, OCC READER, DEPT. OF ADVAITA VEDANTA, RASHTRIYA SANKIRTA VIDYAPEETHA, TIRUPATHI, R/O. TIRUPATHI. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. RASHTRIYA SANKIRTA VIDYAPEETHA, TIRUPATHI 517 507, CHITTOOR DISTRICT, REP.BY ITS REGISTRAR. 2. UNIVERSITY GRANTS COMMISSION, BHADUR SHAH ZAFAR MRG, NEW MEHRAULI ROAD, NEW DELHI, REP. BY ITS SECRETARY. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to IA NO: 1 OF 2003(WPMP 10330 OF 2003 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased IA NO: 1 OF 2004(WPMP 18922 OF 2004 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of first petitioner herein for the post fo Registrar by duly treating the first petitioner to have the requisite service as Lecuturer with 8 years in the Readers Scale along with experience in educational administration IA NO: 1 OF 2006(WPMP 31918 OF 2006 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner for promotion to the post of Registrar in pursuance of the notification F.No. RSVT/Estt/T&NT- 2/6 dated 11-9-2006 by duly taking into account the services rendered by the petitioner as Research Assistant is equivalent to the Lecturer and consequently there upon prepone the promotion of Reader w.e.f 1994 and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. ELEVATED AS JUDGE Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. V B SUBRAHMANYAM 2. The Court made the following order: It is brought to the notice of this Court that, as the petitioner’s counsel died, this court ordered notice to the sole petitioners. The endorsement of the Registry shows that the notices sent were returned with the endorsement ‘Addresse left’. When the matter is pending consideration, the petitioner shall invariably pursue the matter. Despite the same, it shows that the petitioners have no interest in prosecuting the matter. Since the matter is of the year 2003 and the petitioners are having no interest in prosecuting the matter, the writ petition is liable to be dismissed for non-prosecution. 2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. If at the petitioners feels that the cause in the writ petition still survives, they shall move appropriate application within two(02) months. No costs. Miscellaneous applications pending if any shall stand closed. ______________________ RAVI CHEEMALAPATI, J BRS