Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 2443 (AP)

Dommeti Nageswari, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/432/2020 · 2025-08-03

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010003022020 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 432/2020 Between: 1. DOMMETI NAGESWARI,, W/O NARAYANA SWAMY, AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS, HOUSE WIFE, R/O 4-137, BODASAKURU VILLAGE, ALLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (HOME) DEPT. SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT, KAKINADA. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, AMALAPURAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER S I OF POLICE, ALLAVARAM POLICE STATION, ALLAVARAM, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. 5. DOMMETI SRIDHAR NAIDU, , S/O RAMARAO, BODASAKURU VILLAGE, ALLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to to issue a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the 2 respondents no 2 to 4 in no registering F.I.R against the 5th respondent, on the complaints dt 2-12- 2019 and 12-12-2019 given by the petitioner, is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Art 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents no 2 to 4 to register F.I.R on the complaints dt 2-12-2019 and 12-12-2019 IA NO: 1 OF 2020 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased To direct the respondents no 2 to 4 to registering F.I.R against the 5th respondent, on the complaint dt 2-12-2019 and 12-12-2019 given by the petitioner, pending disposal of the above Writ Petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. T V JAGGI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME (AP) 3 The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ, order or direction especially in the nature of Writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ declaring the action of the respondents no 2 to 4 in no registering F.I.R against the 5th respondent, on the complaints dt 2-12- 2019 and 12-12-2019 given by the petitioner, is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 and Art 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents no 2 to 4 to register F.I.R on the complaints dt 2-12- 2019 and 12-12-2019...…” 2. Heard Sri T.V.Jaggi Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the police are not registering the FIR against the 5th respondent on the complaint dated 02.12.2019 and 12.12.2019 given by the petitioner. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader would submit that a crime has been registered against the petitioner in Cr.No.28 of 2020, for the offences punishable under Sections 354-A and 506 IPC and the matter is pending for trial. 5. Recording the same, this writ petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 4 As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATAJYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 04.08.2025 MH 5 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 38 W.P.No.432 of 2020 Dated.04.08.2025 MH