Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010119192025 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/3271/2025 SEFALI DAS ALIAS SAFILE DAS AND 3 ORS W/O- LATE GAUR CHANDRA DAS, R/O- VILL.- GOSSAIGAON WARD NO. 1, P.O. GOSSAIGAON, DIST. KOKRAJHAR, BTC, ASSAM 2: TONMAY DAS S/O- LATE GAUR CHANDRA DAS R/O- VILL.- GOSSAIGAON WARD NO. 1 P.O. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM 3: KRISHNA DAS W/O- LATE NITAI CH. DAS R/O- VILL.- GOSSAIGAON WARD NO. 1 P.O. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM 4: BASHODEV DAS S/O- LATE NITAI CH. DAS R/O- VILL.- GOSSAIGAON WARD NO. 1 P.O. GOSSAIGAON DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSA VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 6 ORS REPRESENTED BY THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM, REVENUE (REFORMS) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-06. Page No.# 2/3 2:THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVT. OF ASSAM REVENUE (REFORMS) AND DISASTER MANAGEMENT DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-06. 3:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER KOKRAJHAR P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTR ASSAM PIN- 783360. 4:THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY BTC KOKRAJHAR ASSAM P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783360. 5:THE JOINT SECRETARY BODOLAND TERRITORIAL COUNCIL KOKRAJHAR P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR ASSAM PIN- 783370. 6:THE CIRCLE OFFICER GOSSAIGAON REVENUE CIRCLE P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783360. 7:THE SUB-DIVISIONAL OFFICER (CIVIL) GOSSAIGAON P.O. AND DIST. KOKRAJHAR BTC ASSAM PIN- 783360 Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. M KHAN, MR A K DAS,MS J AKTAR Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, SC, BTC,SC, REVENUE Page No.# 3/3 BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MANISH CHOUDHURY ORDER Date : 04-12-2025 Ms. J. Akhtar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. M. Khan, learned counsel for the petitioners has submitted that the petitioners want to withdraw this writ petition, with liberty. Ms. G. Hazarika, learned Standing Counsel, Revenue & Disaster Management Department for the respondent nos. 1 & 2; Mr. S.S. Roy, learned Junior Government Advocate, Assam for the respondent no. 3; and Mr. P. Bhowmik, learned Standing Counsel, BTC for the respondent nos. 4, 5, 6 & 7 are present. In view of the above submission made by Ms. Akhtar, learned counsel for the petitioners, the writ petition is dismissed on withdrawal, with the liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant