Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24417 (RAJ)

MAHESH SIYAG S/ CHUTRA RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CW/10704/2025 · 2025-08-20

Maneesh Sharma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:32686] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10704/2025 Mahesh Siyag S/o Chutra Ram, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Jaton Ka Bas, Boranada, Jodhpur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary, Department Of Information Technology And Communication, Government Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Through Its Secretary, Jaipur Road, Ajmer, Rajasthan. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Ram Pratap Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 20/08/2025 1. In the writ petition, the petitioner has raised various issues. However, the learned counsel for the petitioner, upon instructions from his client, submitted that he would be satisfied if the petitioner is permitted to file a representation before the respondent No.2-Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer, encapsulating the grievance(s) raised in the present writ petition within a period of ten days from today. 2. Heard and considered the submissions made at bar. 3. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to file a representation before respondent No.2- Secretary, Rajasthan Public Service Commission, Ajmer. The said respondent is directed to decide the [2025:RJ-JP:32686] (2 of 2) [CW-10704/2025] representation within a period of eight (8) weeks from the date of filing of the representation by a speaking order, in accordance with law. 4. It is made clear that the aforesaid direction to decide such representation has been issued only with a view to ensure an expeditious redressal of the petitioner’s grievance. The same shall not be construed to be an order to decide the representation in a particular manner. 5. The stay application and other pending application(s), if any, also stand disposed of, accordingly. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/41