Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010248822024 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6727/2024 MOHIT KUMAR S/O ASHOK RAY R/O 45 NEW COURT ROAD HIJUGURI DIHINGIA GAON TINSUKIA ASSAM 786192 VERSUS THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF INDIA MINISTRY OF HOME AFFAIRS NEW DELHI-110001 2:THE CHAIRMAN STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION BLOCK-12 CGO COMPLEX LODHI ROAD NEW DELHI-110003 3:THE REGIONAL DIRECTOR (CER) STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION 34-A MAHATMA GANDHI MARG CIVIL LINES KENDRIYA SADAN PRAYAGRAJ UTTAR PRADESH-211001 Page No.# 2/3 4:THE DIRECTOR GENERAL CRPF (RECRUITMENT BRANCH) EAST BLOCK-07 LEVEL-4 SECTOR -01 R.K.PURAM NEW DELHI-110066 5:THE REVIEW MEDICAL BOARD REPRESENTED BY THE PRESIDING OFFICER REVIEW MEDICAL EXAMINATION GROUP CENTRE CRPF MOKAMGHAT CMO (SG) 179 BN. GC CRPF MOKAMGHAT DIST- PATNA BIHAR-803303 6:REGIONAL DIRECTOR (NER) STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION HOUSEFED COMPLEX LAST GATE BELTOLA-BASISTHA ROAD P.O.- ASSAM SACHIVALAYA DISPUR GUWAHATI ASSAM-781006 ------------ Advocate for : MR. A R TAHBILDAR Advocate for : DY.S.G.I. appearing for THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SOUMITRA SAIKIA ORDER 09.12 .2025 Heard Mr. A.R. Tahbildar, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mrs. S. Baruah, learned CGC for the respondents. It is the stand of the respondent that the petitioner at the time of Page No.# 3/3 submitting his application mentioned his domicile state to be the State of Bihar, therefore, the petitioner’s detailed medical examination was carried out in the CRPF Group Centre in Patna as per the choice given by the petitioner in his application and he was found unfit on the ground of being underweight. Subsequently, the Review Medical Board also found the petitioner to be underweight and therefore, he was rejected. Thereafter, the petitioner was presented before the GMCH for medical test and it was found that he was within the permissible parameters in respect of the weight. After submissions made before this Court at some length, the learned counsel for the petitioner sought leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition with liberty to pursue his claims before the High Court of Patna in the State of Bihar, in view of the fact that the petitioner had given his preference for medical test in Composite Hospital of the CRPF at Patna. The prayer made is allowed. Accordingly, this writ petition stands dismissed on withdrawal with liberty. JUDGE Comparing Assistant