Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24416 (BOM)

PATHAN SHAHNAWAZ KHAN MUKHTAR KHAN AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER

WP/8933/2023 · 2025-03-21

Shri Arun R Pedneker

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

wp8933.23 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 WRIT PETITION NO. 8933 OF 2023 Pathan Shahnawaz Khan Mukhtar Khan and another VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ade Ravindra B. AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mr. C.V.Bhadane ….. CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, C.J. & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2025. P.C. : 1. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that, by efflux of time, the issue involved in this Writ Petition does not survive for consideration. 2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. (ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) rlj/ 2025:BHC-AUG:8553-DB