PATHAN SHAHNAWAZ KHAN MUKHTAR KHAN AND ANOTHER v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
WP/8933/2023 · 2025-03-21
Shri Arun R Pedneker
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24416 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24416 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
wp8933.23 -1-
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 940 WRIT PETITION NO. 8933 OF 2023 Pathan Shahnawaz Khan Mukhtar Khan and another VERSUS The State of Maharashtra and another ... Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Ade Ravindra B. AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2: Mr. C.V.Bhadane …..
CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, C.J. & ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J. DATE : 21st MARCH, 2025.
P.C. :
1. The learned counsel for the Petitioners submits that, by efflux of time, the issue involved in this Writ Petition does not survive for consideration.
2. In view of the aforesaid submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous.
(ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.)
(CHIEF JUSTICE) rlj/ 2025:BHC-AUG:8553-DB