IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1891 of 2025 Date of Decision: 25.9.2025 _____________________________________________________________________ Manohar Lal ……...Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors. …....Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? For the Petitioner: Mr. Sameer Miyan, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General and Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. ___________________________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, J. (Oral) While placing on record communication dated 24.9.2025, enclosing therewith office order dated 24.9.2025, issued under signature of Director of School Education, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that mandate contained in the judgment alleged to have been violated stands duly complied with. 2. Having perused aforesaid communication vis-à-vis judgment sought to be executed, there appears to be merit in the contention of learned Additional Advocate General that respondents after having 2 considered case of the petitioner in light of judgment dated 29.11.2024 passed in CWP No. 1638 of 2024, titled Mohit Sharma and Anr. v. State of Himachal Pradesh and Ors., have already granted him due and admissible benefits. 3. Consequently, in view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and as such, present petition is disposed of with direction to the respondents to ensure that consequential benefits, if any, flowing from the compliance as detailed herein above, if not already released, shall be released expeditiously, preferably, within six weeks. September 25, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (manjit) Judge