SANJAY SINGH S/O SHIVRAM GURJAR v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CW/10629/2025 · 2025-07-28
Sudesh Bansal
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24405 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24405 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:28213] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 10629/2025
1. Sanjay Singh S/o Shivram Gurjar, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Dhamadi Ka Pura, Post Office Kemri, District Karauli, Rajasthan - 322216.
2. Laxman Singh S/o Babulal Gurjar, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Amiya, District Dausa, Rajasthan- 303313.
3. Rakesh Kumar Sharma S/o Chhote Lal Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Daluko Ka Baad, Village Chawand Ka Mand, Post Saipura, Tehsil Jamwaramgarh, District Jaipur, Rajasthan- 302027.
4. Amit Sharma S/o Mahesh Chand Sharma, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Boharan Ki Dhani, Kaluvas, Tehsil Ramgarh Pachwara, Kaloowas, District Dausa, Rajasthan- 303505.
5. Sonu Charan D/o Bihari Singh Bhada, Ajmer Road, Malpura, Post Office Malpura, District Tonk, Rajasthan-
304502.
6. Praveen Kumar Sharma S/o Jagdish Prasad Sharma, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Doodhli, District Jaipur, Rajasthan-
303301. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Principal Secretary, Medical And Health Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. The Director, Medical And Health Services, Swasthya Bhawan, Tilak Marg, C-Scheme, District Jaipur.
3. Rajasthan University Of Health Sciences, Through Its Registrar, Sector- 18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur- 302033.
4. The Convenor, Medical Officer, (Medical Recruitment Examination 2024), Sector 18, Kumbha Marg, Pratap Nagar, Tonk Road, Jaipur- 302033.
5. Sachin Gurjar S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Resident Of Bansur, Alwar- 301402 (Roll No. 107096, Cat. Mbc- Ncl, Marks 66/100).
6. Badal Singh S/o Shri Ramesh Chander, Resident Of Uche Ka Para, Tehsil Hindaun, District Karauli- 322241 (Roll No. 101581, Marks 67/1000. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Harendar Neel For Respondent(s) :
[2025:RJ-JP:28213] (2 of 2) [CW-10629/2025] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL
Order 28/07/2025
1. Counsel for petitioner submits that inadvertently, the basic
order could not be challenged in the instant writ petition, hence, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file a fresh.
2. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
3. Stay application and other pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of.
(SUDESH BANSAL),J NITIN /273