Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24404 (RAJ)

SAROVER VIDHYA MANDIR SAMITI v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS

CW/18153/2017 · 2025-03-18

Sudesh Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:12007] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 18153/2017 Sarover Vidhya Mandir Samiti, Mansarover, Jaipur Through Treasurer Smt. Lata Pareek W/o Veerendra Pareek, aged about 50 years, R/o 35/58, Sector 35, Pratap Nagar, Housing Board, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Secretary Urban Development Department, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. Managing Director, Rajasthan Housing Board, Jaipur, Janpath, Jaipur. 3. Deputy Commissioner, Rajasthan Housing Board, Division/circle-5, Pratap Nagar Housing Board, Sector-5, Near Pratap Plaza, Opp. Pnb Bank, Tonk Road, Jaipur. 4. Chief Executive Officer, Nagar Nigam Jaipur, Near Lal Kothi, Jaipur. 5. Mohammad Mosin Khan S/o Mohammad Puttan, R/o 35/355, Sector 35, Pratap Nagar, Housing Board, Jaipur. 6. Majeed Noor S/o Wahid Noor, R/o House No. 35/50, 35/51, Sector-35, Pratap Nagar Housing Board, Jaipur. 7. Shahid Miya S/o Abdul Rahuf, R/o House No. 35/52, Sector-35, Pratap Nagar Housing Board, Jaipur. 8. Mohammad Firoj S/o Not Known, R/o House No. 35/49, Sector-35, Pratap Nagar Housing Board, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.L. Saini For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUDESH BANSAL Order 18/03/2025 1. Counsel for petitioner, on instructions of petitioner, submits that with passage of time, relief prayed for in the petition has [2025:RJ-JP:12007] (2 of 2) [CW-18153/2017] rendered infructuous, therefore, petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the petition. 2. Accordingly, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. 3. Any other pending application(s), if any, stands disposed of. (SUDESH BANSAL),J SOURAV /66