Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2025:JHHC:27876 )
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A. B. A. No. 5321 of 2025
Sarfraz Ansari, son of Sayed Miyan, aged about 30 years, resident of village House No. 39, Kanki, P.O. and P.S. Khaga, District-Deoghar ...... … Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand .…. … Opposite Party
--------
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI For the Petitioner
:Mr. Rahul Ranjan, Advocate For the State : Mr. Naveen Kumar Gaunjhu, A.P.P.
03/ 12.09.2025: Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the State.
2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Khaga P.S. Case No. 05/2025, registered under sections 127 (1), 115(2), 109, 85, 3 (5) of BNS and section 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, pending in the Court of learned Judicial Magistrate, Ist Class, Madhupur.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner happens to be husband of the informant and there is general and omnibus allegation. He submits that even injury has not been found on the body of the informant. On these grounds, he submits that the petitioner may kindly be provided privilege of anticipatory bail.
4.
Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer and submits that petitioner is husband of the informant.
5.
Considering that petitioner is husband of the informant and it has been pointed out that injury is not on the body of the informant, in view of that the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned court within two weeks from today and the learned court shall release the petitioner on terms and conditions and sureties as learned court deems fit and proper.
6. This anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
( Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) satyarthi-