Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24402 (AP)

EDIGA PRASADAMMA v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/17484/2025 · 2025-07-14

Subba Reddy Satti

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010344932025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] TUESDAY, THE FIFTEENTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION NO: 17484/2025 Between: 1. EDIGA PRASADAMMA, W/O EDIGA NARARAYANA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O. DEVARABANDA VILLAGE, DHONE MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT,VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE COMMISSIONER OF APPEALS, OFFICE OF THE CHIEF COMMISSIONER FOR LAND ADMINISTRATION, APIIC BUILDINGS, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE TAHSILDAR, DHONE MANDAL, NANDYAL DISTRICT. 4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, RURAL POLICE STATION, DHONE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased be pleased to issue appropriate Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly the Respondents No.3 and 4 in interfering the petitioner assigned land in Sy.No.637-4A3 admeasuring Ac.5.00 cents of Devarabanda Village, Dhone Mandal, Nandyal District during the pendency of the revision petition bearing No.BCW 1/162/2017 before the 2nd respondent is illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Article 14, 21 and 300A of Constitution of India consequently direct the Respondents No.3 and 4 not to interfere with 2 the petitioner land in Sy.No.637-4A3 admeasuring Ac.5.00 cents of Devarabanda Village, Dhone Mandal, Nandyal District during the pendency of the revision petition bearing No.BCW 1/162/2017 before the 2nd respondent and to pass any such other orders or orders as the Honble court feel deem fit and proper in the circumstances of the case in the interests of Justice IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. G SEKHAR REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following order: Sri G.Sekhar Reddy, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file fresh writ petition. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 15.07.2025 SNI 3 145 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI WRIT PETITION No.17484 OF 2025 Dated: 15.07.2025 SNI