SURESH KUMAR AND OTHERS v. STATE OF HP AND ANOTHER
EX.P./1893/2025 · 2025-09-22
Ajay Mohan Goel
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24397 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24397 (HP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes
IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No.1893 of 2025
Date of decision: 22.09.2025 Suresh Kumar & Ors. ...Petitioners. Versus The State of Himachal Pradesh & Anr. ...Respondents. Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge.
Whether approved for reporting? For the petitioners : Mr. Anshul Jairath, Advocate.
For the respondents : Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, Additional Advocate General.
Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Pushpinder Jaswal, learned Additional Advocate General, accepts notice on behalf of the respondents.
2.
Learned Additional Advocate General submits that appropriate orders in terms of the judgment in issue shall positively be passed by the Authority concerned within a period of three weeks from today. His statement is taken on record.
3.
These proceedings are accordingly closed, with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival thereof, by filing an appropriate application, if needful is not done within a period of three weeks from today by the Authority concerned and
-2-
Registry shall not insist upon the application being accompanied by the affidavit of the petitioner. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of accordingly.
(Ajay Mohan Goel) 22nd September, 2025
Judge (Pardeep)