Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24394 (RAJ)

SHIVCHARAN S/O SHRI MITHALAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLW/947/2025 · 2025-07-21

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:27054-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Writ Petition (Parole) No. 947/2025 1. Shivcharan S/o Shri Mithalal, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Mahanandanpur, Jalokhara, Police Station Sadar, Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (Presently Petitioner Confined In Open Jail, Sanganer, Jaipur). 2. Rajesh @ Monu S/o Shri Shiv Charan, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Mahanandanpur, Jalokhara, Police Station Sadar, Gangapurcity, District Sawai Madhopur (Raj.) (Presently Petitioner Confined In Open Jail, Sanganer, Jaipur). ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Home Depart- ment, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.) 2. The District Collector, Jaipur, District Jaipur (Raj.) 3. Superintendent Of Central Jail, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. M.S. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Sudesh Saini, AGA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AVNEESH JHINGAN HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE BHUWAN GOYAL Order 21/07/2025 1. This petition is filed seeking third regular parole. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have submitted the application for release on third regular parole of forty days before the District Parole Advisory Committee. However, their application has yet not been decided and is still pending. Therefore, counsel for the petitioners has [2025:RJ-JP:27054-DB] (2 of 2) [CRLW-947/2025] made a limited prayer to direct the Parole Committee to decide the applications of the petitioners as expeditiously as possible. 3. This petition is disposed of at this stage with a direction that the parole application of the petitioners shall be decided within two weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. Needless to say, the petitioners shall be at liberty to avail remedies in accordance with law if aggrieved of the decision. (BHUWAN GOYAL),J (AVNEESH JHINGAN),J PAYAL DHAWAN /22