Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24377 (AP)

PESARAPATI VENKATA CHARY v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/18149/2025 · 2025-07-24

Gannamaneni Ramakrishna Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 APHC010344742025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3328] FRIDAY,THE TWENTY FIFTH DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO: 18149/2025 Between: 1. PESARAPATI VENKATA CHARY, S/O. LATE SANAKARA CHARY AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, OCCUPATION ADVOCATE, R/O. PLOT. NO. 50, ROAD NO.2, CHITRASEEMA COLONY, VANASTALIPURAM, HYDERABAD, TELANGANA STATE. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI. 2. THE A P INFORMATION COMMISSIONER, MANGALAGIRI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KANIGIRI, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, KURUCHEDU VILLAGE, KURCHEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 5. THE PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER CUM DEPUTY TAHSILDAR, KURUCHEDU VILLAGE, KURCHEDU MANDAL, PRAKASAM DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. MAHADEVA KANTHRIGALA Counsel for the Respondent(S): 2 1. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORAL ORDER: Heard Sri Mahadeva Kanthrigala, learned Counsel for the Petitioner and Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue. 2. Sri T. Sanjeeva Rao, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue has submitted the Written Instructions furnished by the Tahsildar, Kurichedu Mandal, Prakasam District dated 14.07.2025 along with the photocopies of the documents, which have been supplied to the Writ Petitioner. Copies of it are supplied to the learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner and the same are taken on record. 3. Learned Counsel for the Writ Petitioner, on instructions, submits that the Writ Petitioner has received the required documents and therefore, no further consideration of this Writ Petition is necessary. 4. Accordingly, this Writ Petition is disposed of. No order as to costs. 5. Interlocutory Applications, if any, stand closed in terms of this order. ______________________________________ GANNAMANENI RAMAKRISHNA PRASAD, J Dt: 25.07.2025 Vns