HARI SHANKAR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS
WRIC/6091/2025 · 2025-03-19
Anish Kumar Gupta, Manoj Kumar Gupta
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24374 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24374 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:40923-DB HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD (Sl. No.50) Court No. - 21 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6091 of 2025 Petitioner :- Hari Shankar And Another Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Amish Kumar Srivastava,Prapti Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Manoj Kumar Gupta,J. Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta,J.
1. The petitioners have filed the instant petition under Article 226 of the Constitution for a direction to respondent no.2 to decide their application dated 30.01.2025 and to restrain the respondents from interfering in the possession of the petitioners.
2. Learned Standing Counsel has placed on record the written instructions received from Sub-Division Magistrate, Varanasi (respondent no.3), according to which the petitioners have executed a sale deed on 28.02.2025 in favour of the State. Copy of the sale deed has been annexed alongwith written instructions.
3. Learned counsel petitioners very fairly concedes that in view of the subsequent development the cause of action does not survive.
4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of as infructuous. Order Date :- 20.3.2025 Shubham Arya (Anish Kumar Gupta, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, J.) Digitally signed by :- SHUBHAM ARYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad