[2025:RJ-JP:29900] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8969/2025 Shankar S/o Chhitarlal, R/o Sirohi, Police Station Datwas, Tehsil Niwai, District Tonk (Raj.) (At Present In District Jail Tonk). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.R. Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Devi Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN Order 04/08/2025 1. This instant application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Shankar S/o Chhitarlal in FIR No.103/2025 dated 25.06.2025 registered at P.S. Diggi District - Tonk, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2) of BNS. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant-accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the [2025:RJ-JP:29900] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-8969/2025] investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody. 3. Learned counsel for petitioner submitted that petitioner is an innocent person and he has been falsely implicated by police. He further submitted that petitioner is not a member of systematic cyber crime activity and there is no transaction trail to show cheating with any person. He also submitted that petitioner was using his own mobile number and there is no evidence to show that he has used any SIM obtained on fake ID. 4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by learned Public Prosecutor. 5. Heard learned counsel for the applicant-accused and learned Public Prosecutor. Perused the material placed on record by both the parties. 6. Having considered the report received from SHO, P.S. Diggi, Dist. Tonk, about role and involvement of present petitioner in the incident and also considering the fact that except present case, there is no other criminal case registered against the petitioner, I am of considered view that this is a fit case to enlarge petitioner on bail. 7. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, [2025:RJ-JP:29900] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-8969/2025] the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant- accused Shankar S/o Chhitarlal. 8. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Shankar S/o Chhitarlal is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused Shankar S/o Chhitarlal is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of ₹25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law. (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be cancelled. 9. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail. (ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /337