( 2025:HHC:29216 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.13890 of 2025 Decided on: 29th August, 2025 Sohan Lal .......Petitioner versus State of H.P and another ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. Tarun K. Sharma, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Anup Rattan, A.G with Mr. Sikander Bhushan, Dy. A.G. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Sikander Bhushan, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is left with less than two years for retirements. He has made a representation for being posted at GMS Tanyur under complex GSSS Dhanather against a vacant post, in terms of Clause 5.5 of the Comprehensive Guiding Principles- 2013. He submits that the representation though was submitted on 01.07.2025, but till date no decision has been taken. In this background, a prayer is made to direct the 2nd 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. ( 2025:HHC:29216 ) 2 respondent to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P-1 in a time bound manner. 3. The prayer being innocuous is not opposed. The petition is disposed of with direction to the 2nd respondent to consider and decide the representation Annexure P-1 within three weeks from today by passing a detailed and reasoned order. 4. The writ petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending applications, if any. August 29, 2025 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen) Judge