Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24366 (CHH)

RAMKUMAR DADSENA v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4008/2023 · 2025-09-16

Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:47867 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4008 of 2023 1 - Ramkumar Dadsena S/o. Late Shri Bartiyaram Dadsena, Aged About 58 Years Working As Headmaster (Middle School), Government Boys Pre Middle School, Kusmi, Block - Berla, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. R/o. Ward No. 10, B.T.I. Colony Bemetara, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 2 - Sanjay Prasad Payasi, S/o. Shri Onkar Prasad Payasi, Aged About 57 Years Working As Headmaster (Middle School), Government Boys Pre Middle School, Bhadrali, Block - Navagarh, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. R/o. Ward No. 11, Krishna Vihar Colony Bemetara, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department Of School Education, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 2 - Director, Lok Shikshan, Directorate, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - District Education Officer, Bemetara, District - Bemetara Chhattisgarh. RAGHVENDRA JAT Digitally signed by RAGHVENDRA JAT 2 4 - Hemant Kumar Bhuwal Lecturer ( E-Cadre), Working In District Education And Training Center, Bemetara, District Bemetara Chhattisgarh. 5 - Smt. Madhuri Gupta, Lecturer ( E-Cadre), Presently Working In Government Higher Secondary Girls School, Kawarda, District Kabirdham Chhattisgarh. 6 - Purshottam Singh Yadu, Lecturer ( E-Cadre), Presently Working In Government Higher, Secondary School, Bhanwarpur, District - Mahasamund Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate. For Respondent(s)/State : Mr. Ajay Kumar Pandey, G.A. For Intervenors Mr. Prabhat Kumar Saxena, Advocate and Mr. Vaibhav Govardhan, ADvocate. Hon’ble Mr. Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 17/09/2025 1. By way of this petition, the petitioner has prayed for following reliefs:- “10.1 That, the petitioners most humbly and respectfully prays to this Hon'ble Court to issue appropriate order/direction/writ for calling the records pertaining to the subject matter. 10.2 That, the petitioners most humbly and respectfully 3 prays to this Hon'ble Court to issue appropriate order/direction/writ for quashing the impugned seniority list dated 9.6.2023 (Annexure-P/1). 10.3 That, the petitioners most humbly and respectfully prays to this Hon'ble Court to issue appropriate order/direction/writ to respondent authorities for issuance of fresh seniority list of Head Master Middle School (E- Cadre) in the department after eliminating the names of the Lecturer (E-Cadre). 10.4 Any other relief whatsoever, this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper may also be granted to the petitioners.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that with the afflux of time, the petition has been rendered infructuous. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents agreed with the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioner and has no objection. 4. Accordingly, the present writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Raghu Jat