Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15713 MFA No. 2312 of 2017
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 2312 OF 2017 (MV-D)
BETWEEN:
1.
G. PRASAD S/O PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS R/O TEMPLE BEEDI CHIKKAJOGIHALLI VILLAGE, SHIKARIPURA TALUK - 577428 SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT NOW R/O SOMAPPA, S/O LATE HALESHA TIPPU NAGAR, 6TH CROSS, GOPALA, SHIVAMOGGA CITY.
2.
PRASANNA G.
S/O PUTTASWAMY AGED ABOUT 28 YEARS, R/O TEMPLE BEEDI, CHIKKAJOGIHALLI VILLAGE, SHIKARIPURA TALUK, SHIVAMOGGA DISTRICT. …APPELLANTS (BY MANJULADEVI R KAMADALLI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
S. K. LOKESH S/O KARIYAPPA K. V. MAJOR, R/O SRI BALAJI EXIMS, DHARMASRI NILAYA, 1ST CROSS, MISSION COMPOUND, SHIVAMOGGA CITY - 577202.
Digitally signed by LAKSHMINARAYAN N Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA
- 2 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15713 MFA No. 2312 of 2017
2.
REVANA SIDDA HAVALADA S/O VIRUPAKSHAPPA AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS R/O HOSAMANE, 6TH CROSS, SHIVAMOGGA CITY - 577002. …RESPONDENTS THIS MFA IS FILED U/S 173(1) OF MV ACT AGAINST THE
JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED: 01.08.2016 PASSED IN MVC NO.168/2016 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND AMACT-8, SHIVAMOGGA, PARTLY ALLOWING THE CLAIM PETITION FOR COMPENSATION AND SEEKING ENHANCEMENT OF COMPENSATION.
THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER:
CORAM: HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE LALITHA KANNEGANTI
ORAL ORDER
This appeal is of the year 2017 and even till now, the notice has not been issued to the respondents even for the first time.
2. Earlier, a cost Rs.500/- was imposed and no acknowledgment is filed for having paid the said cost. When this matter came up before this Court on 01.04.2025, there was no representation on behalf of both the parties and the matter was directed to be listed under the caption for 'Dismissal' today.
- 3 -
NC: 2025:KHC:15713 MFA No. 2312 of 2017
2. Today also, there is no representation on behalf of the appellants. It appears that the appellants are not interested to pursue the matter.
3. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous First Appeal is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (LALITHA KANNEGANTI) JUDGE
SSD List No.: 1 Sl No.: 18