Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24362 (JHR)

BISHWANATH TUDU ALIAS VISHWANATH TUDU v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5220/2025 · 2025-09-10

Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:27565 --1-- A.B.A. No. 5220 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND, RANCHI A.B.A. No. 5220 of 2025 ---- Bishwanath Tudu @ Vishwanath Tudu, aged about 31 years, son of Jitu Tudu, resident of 8/a Bhatin, PO and PS – Jadugora, District – East Singhbhum .... Petitioner -- Versus -- 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Upal Tudu, wife of Bishwanath Tudu @ Vishwanath Tudu, resident of village – Bhatin, PO and PS – Jadugora, District – East Singhbhum .... Opposite Parties ---- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI --- For the Petitioner :- Mr. Manoj Kr. Dash, Advocate For the State :- Ms. Anuradha Sahay, Advocate ---- 04/10.09.2025 Heard learned counsel appearing for the petitioner as well as the learned counsel appearing for the State. 2. The petitioner is apprehending his arrest in connection with Jadugora P.S. Case No.94 of 2023 corresponding to G.R. Case No.20 of 2024 for the alleged offences registered under Sections 498A, 313, 504, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act pending in the Court of learned ACJM, Ghatsila. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the petitioner happened to the husband of the informant. He submits that the case has been registered under Sections 498A, 313, 504, 506 and 34 of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act, however the charge-sheet has been 2025:JHHC:27565 --2-- A.B.A. No. 5220 of 2025 submitted only under Section 498A of Indian Penal Code and Sections 3/4 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 4. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer and submits that the petitioner is the husband and he is the main culprit. 5. In view of the above and considering that the petitioner is the husband and even for the allegation of abortion charge-sheet has not been submitted under the concerned section and in that view of the matter the petitioner is directed to surrender before the learned Court within two weeks and the learned Court shall release the petitioner on such terms and conditions or the sureties as the learned Court may deem fit and proper. (Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi, J.) Sangam/