CRM-M-21477- IN THE H (205) HARDEEP SING STATE OF PUNJ CORAM: HON Present: Mr. Ms. S *** MANISHA BATR 1. The Section 482 of Bh for grant of interi 15.07.2025 registe Substances Act later on) at Police filed by him seekin 2. The a 15.07.2025, on re petitioner was inv was present near T accompanied with -2026 (O&M) 1 THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB A CHANDIGARH SINGH Versus PUNJAB HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MANIS Sukhdeep Singh Khaira, Advocat Ms. Sakshi Bakshi, AAG, Punjab *** BATRA, J. (ORAL) The instant one is the third petition of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanh interim anticipatory bail in case aris registered under Section 15 of Narc (for short “NDPS Act”) (Section Police Station Lehra, District Sangru seeking pre-arrest bail have been dism The aforementioned FIR was regist on receipt of a secret information as involved in sale of intoxicant tablet near Tibbian Wala fields for selling d with some other person, a raiding pa JAB AND HARYANA AT ARH CRM-M-21477-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 29.04.2026 ... Petitioner ...Respondent ANISHA BATRA dvocate for the petitioner etition filed by the petitioner under a Sanhita, 2023 (for short “BNSS”) se arising out of FIR No.167 dated Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Section 29 of the NDPS Act added Sangrur. The previous petitions as n dismissed as withdrawn. registered on the allegations that on ation to the effect that the present t tablets and on that very day also he elling intoxicant tablets, while being ing party was formed which reached 2026 oner dent nder SS”) ated ropic dded ns as at on esent so he eing ched AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-21477- at the informed pl was tried to be sto of darkness by rus vehicle, 72 Kgs o was taken into pos 3. As pe was revealed that who was joined in car which was rec Rs.2,40,000/-. H himself made in Apprehending his then before this C against him. Proc same was ordered 4. It is suffered a road a abdominal trauma condition is critic bowel perforation abdominal surgery deserves to be ext change in the circ -2026 (O&M) 2 ed place and found two persons sittin be stopped, both the occupants manag by rushing towards the nearby paddy Kgs of poppy husk was recovered fr to possession. As per the further allegations, during d that the above-mentioned car was o ined into investigation and who disclo as recovered from the spot to the p . He also showed WhatsApp cha de in this context. The petitioner ng his arrest, he moved applications b this Court but he did not get any re . Proclamation proceedings have been rdered to be issued for 04.04.2026. It is argued by learned counsel fo road accident on 07.03.2026 and has trauma/injuries. He has remained critical. The findings given by the ration due to intestinal rupture and ch urgery. He requires further medical be extended benefit of interim pre-arr e circumstances from the date of dism s sitting in a car. When the vehicle managed to flee by taking advantage paddy crop fields. On checking the red from the boot of the car which during the course of investigation, it was owned by one Munish Kumar, disclosed that he had sold the said the present petitioner for a sum of p chat between the petitioner and itioner was nominated as accused. tions before the Sessions Court and any relief. Warrant of arrest issued e been initiated against him and the sel for the petitioner that he had nd has sustained serious chest and ined admitted in hospital and his by the doctors are of suggestive of nd chest injury. He has got a major edical care and for that purpose, he arrest bail. There is a substantial of dismissal of his previous petitions hicle tage g the hich on, it mar, said m of and used. t and sued d the had and is e of ajor e, he ntial tions AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-21477- which could not b the investigation medically fit. It is he deserves to be e 5. Status there are serious contraband had be by the petitioner a He evaded his app been initiated agai The medical reco exceptional or ext There are no subs It is, therefore, arg 6. This C for the parties at co 7. The p anticipatory bail h for grant of inter roadside accident petitioner as issue hospital on 11.03 though from this r -2026 (O&M) 3 not be foreseen by the petitioner. H ation and cooperate with the same t. It is, therefore, argued that the petiti to be extended benefit of interim bail. Status report has been filed. Learned rious allegations against the petition had been recovered from the vehicle w oner at the time of recovery. He had m is apprehension for long time. Even p d against him. He has not been admi l record produced by him is more or extra-ordinary circumstance for gra o substantial changes in the circumstan re, argued that the petition does not de This Court has heard the rival submis es at considerable length. The previous two petitions as filed bail had been dismissed as withdraw f interim anticipatory bail on the gro cident and his condition is critical. issued by the Park Hospital shows th 11.03.2026, but had left against med this record, it has been revealed that ner. He is ready and willing to join same as and when he becomes e petition deserves to be allowed and bail. earned State counsel has argued that etitioner as commercial quantity of icle which was owned and occupied e had managed to flee from the spot. Even proclamation proceedings have admitted in any hospital at present. more than one month old. No for grant of interim bail is made out. stances from his earlier petitions. not deserve to be allowed. ubmissions made by learned counsel filed by the petitioner for grant of thdrawn. Now, he is making prayer the ground that he had met with a itical. Discharge summary of the ows that he had admitted in the said edical advice on the same day, d that the petitioner had undergone a join omes and that ty of pied spot. have sent. No out. ions. unsel nt of rayer ith a f the said , ne a AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRM-M-21477- surgery and on ac petitioner has also and Ankur Advan medicines, howeve he is not capable Investigating Offic into consideration his recent medica compelling ground 482 of BNSS wh ordinary circumsta 8. It is, shall not be constr shall not influence 9. Since any, is rendered in 29.04.2026 Amit Sharma -2026 (O&M) 4 on account of injuries received by him s also produced a copy of prescription Advance Urology Centre showing th owever, the same does not reveal that pable of joining investigation proceed g Officer. The allegations against him ration the fact that no material has b edical condition, this Court is of th ground has been made out for exercis SS which are required to be exercis cumstances. Accordingly, the petition It is, however, clarified that the ob construed as an expression of opinion uence the outcome of the trial. Since the main petition has been dism ered infructuous. (MA Whether speaking/reasoned:- Yes Whether reportable:- Yes/No by him in a roadside accident. The ription issued by Janak Surgery Care ing that he has been advised some al that his condition is still critical or roceedings by appearing before the st him are serious in nature. Taking has been placed on record showing s of the considered opinion that no exercising the powers under Section exercised in exceptional and extra- etition is dismissed. e observations made hereinabove inion on the merits of the case and dismissed, pending application, if (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE Yes/No The Care some al or e the king wing t no ction - bove and n, if AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.30 09:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.