Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24358 (JHR)

BASHIR UDDIN ALIAS BASHIR UDDIN MANSURI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

WPC/4659/2023 · 2025-01-02

Rajesh Shankar

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 W.P.(C) No. 4659 of 2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI W.P.(C) No. 4659 of 2023 --- 1. Bashir Uddin @ Bashir Uddin Mansuri 2. Md. Jahurddin @ Md. Jahurddin Mansuri 3. Md. Masir Alam @ Md. Masir Uddin All sons of Late Mohammad Aavid, residents of Village- Chiniya, P.O. & P.S.- Chiniya, District- Garhwa … … Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. The Secretary, Department of Revenue, Registration and Land Reforms, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 3. The Secretary, Water Resources Department, Government of Jharkhand, Ranchi 4. The Chief Engineer, Water Resources Department, Medininagar at Daltonganj, District- Palamau 5. The Deputy Commissioner, Garhwa 6. The District Land Acquisition Officer, Garhwa 7. The Special Land Acquisition Officer, North Koel Pariyojna, Medininagar, Palamau at Daltonganj 8. The Additional Collector, Garhwa 9. The Sub-Divisional Officer, Ranka, Garhwa, District- Garhwa 10. The Circle Officer, Chiniya, Garhwa, District- Garhwa 11. The Executive Engineer, Water Ways Division, Garhwa …. … Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAJESH SHANKAR For the Petitioners : Mr. Shashank Shekhar, A.C. to Mr. Mahesh Kumar Sinha, Advocate For the Respondents : Mrs. Nirupama, A.C. to Sr.S.C.-II Order No. 06 Dated: 02.01.2025 The present writ petition has been filed for issuance of direction upon the concerned respondent to pay compensation and to provide other benefits under the scheme to the petitioners for acquisition of their lands appertaining to Khata No. 16, plot nos. 1499, 1500, 1505 and 1585 as well as Khata No. 142, plot nos. 1501, 1503, 1504 and 1506 measuring total area of 3.75 acres of Village- Chiniya, P.S.- Chiniya, District- Garhwa, for construction of Dhankutti Nala Check Dam. 2 W.P.(C) No. 4659 of 2023 2. Mrs. Nirupama, learned A.C. to Sr.S.C.-II appearing on behalf of the respondents, submits that the claim of the petitioners is required to be factually examined by the concerned authority. Hence, if the petitioners prefer a fresh representation in this regard before the Special Land Acquisition Officer, North Koel Pariyojna, Medininagar, Palamau at Daltonganj (the respondent no. 7) along with relevant documents, an appropriate decision will be taken by the said respondent within a time frame. 3. Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the nature of prayer made by the petitioners in the present writ petition, the petitioners are given liberty to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no. 7. On receipt of the said representation, the respondent no. 7, after providing due opportunity of hearing to the petitioners as well as other concerned person(s), if so required, shall take an appropriate informed decision in accordance with law within three months from the date of filing of the said representation. 4. The writ petition is accordingly disposed of with aforesaid liberty and direction. (Rajesh Shankar, J.) Ritesh/