- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:5510 MFA No. 3237 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 6TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 3237 OF 2024 (MV-D) BETWEEN: KUMARA, S/O PAPEGOWDA, AGED ABOUT 42 YEARS, SHINDABHOGANAHLLI VILLAGE, CHINAKURALI HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. …APPELLANT (BY SRI KALYAN R, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. LAKSHMAMMA, W/O LATE M.RAJU, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, 2. S.K.ISHWARAYA, D/O KUMARA, AGED ABOUT 19 YEARS, 3. AMITHKUMARA K.S., S/O KUMARA, AGED ABOUT 16 YEARS, RESPONDENT NO.3 IS A MINOR, HENCE R/BY GRANDMOTHER LAKSHAMMA, W/O LATE RAJU. ALL ARE R/AT #170, HARAVAU VILLAGE, CHINAKURALI HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. 4. SANNTHAYAMMA K.S., Digitally signed by KAVYA R Location: High Court of Karnataka - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:5510 MFA No. 3237 of 2024 W/O RAVI, MAJOR, KANIVEKOPPALU VILLAGE, CHINNAKURALLI HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. 5. JAGADHEESHA T.S., S/O THIMMEGOWDA, MAJOR, SHINDABHOONAHALLI VILLAGE, KANIVEKOPPALU VILLAGE, CHINNAKURALLI HOBLI, PANDAVAPURA TALUK, MANDYA DISTRICT - 571 434. 6. THE MANAGER, HDFC-ERGO GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD., # MAHARAJA COMPLEX, OPPOSITE SUBURBAN BUS STAND, BENGALURU, NEELGIRI ROAD, MYSURU - 570 001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI MUKUNDA P., ADVOCATE FOR R1 TO R3; SRI B.PRADEEP, ADVOCATE FOR R6; R4 AND R5 ARE SERVED) THIS MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 173(1) OF THE MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 PRAYING TO MODIFY THE JUDGMENT AND AWARD DATED 15.02.2024 PASSED IN MVC NO.821/2022 BY THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND MACT AT PANDAVAPURA. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE PRADEEP SINGH YERUR ORAL JUDGMENT Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of this appeal. The appellant is - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:5510 MFA No. 3237 of 2024 physically present before the Court and signed the memo along with the counsel, who has identified him. 2. The said memo is accepted. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. In view of dismissal of this appeal, pending application, if any, would pale into insignificance. Sd/- (PRADEEP SINGH YERUR) JUDGE CPN CT: BHK