IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 14093 of 2025 Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 ____________________________________________________________ Ajeet Singh …….Petitioner Versus State of H.P. and Others ….Respondents ____________________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioner: Mr. Onkar Jairath, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. B.C. Verma and Mr. Vishal Panwar, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. ____________________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge (oral): Learned counsel representing the petitioner on instructions states that petitioner would be content and satisfied in case his pending representation (Annexure P-4) is considered and decided, in time bound manner. 2. Mr. Ravi Chauhan, learned Deputy Advocate General, fairly states that pending representation, if not already decided, shall be decided expeditiously. 3. Consequently in view of the above, the present petition stands disposed with the direction to respondents to consider and decide the pending representation (Annexure P-4) of the petitioner, expeditiously, preferably, within a period of two weeks. Ordered accordingly. Needless to say, authority concerned while doing the needful in terms of instant order, shall afford an opportunity of being heard to the petitioner and pass 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 appropriate orders thereupon taking note of transfer policy, which certainly enables an employee to seek transfer or adjustment at a convenient station, on account of adverse family circumstances. Pending application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge September 02, 2025 (Shamsh Tabrez)