Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24351 (RAJ)

MR. BRIJESH KUMAR MAHESHWARI S/O SHRI RADHEY SHYAM MAHESHWARI v. STATE OF RAJSTHAN

CW/11058/2025 · 2025-08-01

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:29412] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.11058/2025 Mr. Brijesh Kumar Maheshwari S/o Shri Radhey Shyam Maheshwari, Aged About 65 Years, R/o 264, Barkat Nagar, Tonk Phatak, Jaipur (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajsthan, Through Principal Secretary, Urban Development And Housing Department, Government Secretariat, Jaipur (Raj.). 2. The Rajasthan Real Estate Regulatory Authority, Through Its Registrar, 2Nd Floor, Udhyog Bhawan, C-Scheme, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. M/s Prem Sagar Infra Projects Private Limited, Through His Authorized Representative, 11, S-1, Rishi Residency, 2Nd Floor Mission Compound, Ajmer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 4. Shri Sita Ram Todawat S/o Shri Hari Krishan Todawat, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Khasra No. 87, Kesar Nagar, Village Sukhiya, Tehsil Sanganer, District Jaipur (Raj.). 5. Icici Bank Limited, Through Its Authorised Representative, Icici Bank Tower, Bandra-Kurla Complex, Mumbai-400051, Branch Office At Sahakaar Marg, Jaipur, Rajasthan ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rishi Raj Maheshwari JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 01/08/2025 1. For a limited prayer, this writ petition has been submitted seeking directions to the respondent No.2 to speed up the execution proceedings pending before it. [2025:RJ-JP:29412] (2 of 2) [CW-11058/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for implementation of the order dated 08.11.2023, an execution application was submitted before the RERA Authority on 02.01.2024, but inspite of passing of considerable time, the proceedings have not been finalised. Learned counsel submits that there is no stay on the order dated 08.11.2023 passed by the RERA. Hence, the respondent No.2 be directed to decide the execution application expeditiously within time frame. 3. Considering the arguments put forward by learned counsel for the petitioner and looking to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner, this Court deems it just and proper to dispose of the instant writ petition with the expectation from the respondent No.2 to make all possible endeavours to decide the pending execution application expeditiously as early as possible, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. 4. Stay application as well as all applications (pending, if any) also stand disposed of. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/7