( 2025:HHC:29064 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA. CWP No.13878 of 2025 Decided on: 28th August, 2025 Vijay Kumar .......Petitioner versus State of H.P and others ...Respondents Coram The Hon’ble Mr. Justice Satyen Vaidya, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 For the petitioner: Mr. R.L. Chaudhary and Mr.H.R. Sidhu, Advocates. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Dy. A.G. Satyen Vaidya, Judge (Oral) Notice. Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, learned Deputy Advocate General appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondents. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner limits the prayer to the extent of direction to respondent No.2 to decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P-4 in a time bound manner. 3. It has been contended that on account of individual hardship faced by the petitioner, he has made a representation to the competent authority i.e. respondent 1 Whether the reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes. ( 2025:HHC:29064 ) 2 No.2 on 30.07.2025, but the same has not been decided till date. 4. The prayer being innocuous is allowed. Respondent No.2 is directed to consider and decide the representation of the petitioner Annexure P-4 within a period of four weeks from today. 5. The petition is disposed of in the aforesaid terms, so also the pending applications, if any. August 28, 2025 ( Satyen Vaidya ) (naveen) Judge