Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010245542025 2025:GAU-AS:16093 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/2663/2025 RAJIBUL ALI S/O- LATE ABDUL KADAR. R/O- VILLAGE-HASARA, .P.O.- BAGUDI, P.S- BARPETA, DISTRICT- BARPETA, ASSAM, PIN-781311 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, ASSAM Advocate for the Petitioner : G UDDIN, MR S ISLAM,MR A K AZAD,P ADHIKARI Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA ORDER Date : 26.11.2025 1. Heard Mr. A.K Azad, learned counsel for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D.P Goswami, learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Assam. 2. This is an application filed U/S 482 of the BNSS, 2023 for grant of pre- arrest bail to the accused/petitioner namely, Rajibul Ali in connection with Mukalmua P.S Case No. 244/2025 (GR No. 762/2025) filed U/S 69 of the Page No.# 2/3 BNS, 2023. 3. The allegation stated in the FIR is that the informant/victim was in a love relationship with the present petitioner and had maintained a physical relationship with the petitioner upon the promise to marry her. Subsequently, the love relationship ended and the petitioner, who had recorded some obscene photos and videos of the informant/victim, made the same viral though social media such as facebook and instagram. 4. On perusal of the Case Diary, it appears that the version of the informant is contradictory to what she had stated in the FIR, in as much as she stated that the accused had forcefully married her by conducting court marriage at Barpeta. Therefore, prima facie it appears that Section 69 BNS, 2023 may not be attracted in the facts of the present case. As far as uploading of obscene photos and videos of the informant/victim is concerned, which should attract Section 67 of the IT Act, the instant case has not been registered under the same Section and there is nothing available in the Case Diary either, with regard to such viral photos and videos of the informant/victim. 5. Considering the above, the prayer for pre-arrest bail is allowed. 1. The above named accused/petitioner, in the event of his arrest in connection with this case, shall be released on pre-arrest bail on furnishing a bail bond of Rs. 50,000/- with 1(one) local surety of like amount to the satisfaction of the arresting authority, in connection with the aforesaid case. 2. It is further provided that the petitioner shall cooperate with the investigation. 6. Bail petition stands disposed of. JUDGE Page No.# 3/3 Comparing Assistant