[2025:RJ-JP:9719] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1389/2015 1. Heera Lal Khati Son Of Shri Mohan Lal Khati, Vpo Ramner Dhani, Via Madanganj Kishangarh, District Ajmer 2. Jitendra Sharma Son Of Shri Mohan Lal Sharma, Vpo Mundoti, District Ajmer 3. Satish Kumar Dagur Son Of Shri Surat Singh, B-316, Jp Colony, Sector No. 4, Vidhyadhar Nagar, Jaipur 4. Mahesh Kumar Sharma Son Of Shri Makkhan Lal Sharma, Vpo Daulatpura, Tehsil Amer, District Jaipur 5. Prasoon Swarup Mathur Son Of Shri Niranjan Swarup, 4- J-15, Shri Ram Vihar Colony, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer 6. Sanjay Bhargav Son Of Shri Ramesh Chnadra Bhargava, 2-Gha-34, Shri Ram Vihar, Vaishali Nagar, Ajmer ----Petitioners Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Secretary, Education Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Barmer ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 1406/2015 Rajendra Singh Panwar Son Of Shri Sewaram Panwar, 555/1 Shantipura Vaishali Nagar Road, Ajmer ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan Through Its Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur 2. Secretary, Education Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur 3. Director, Elementary Education, Rajasthan, Bikaner 4. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad, Chittorgarh ----Respondents [2025:RJ-JP:9719] (2 of 2) [CW-1389/2015] For Petitioner(s) : Mr. B.B.L Sharma For Respondent(s) : Ms. Sara Parveen for Mr. Kapil Prakash Mathur Mr. Saumil Sharma for Mr. Gopal Krishan Sharma, AGC HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN Judgment 05/03/2025 Learned counsel for the respondents have submitted that the matter pertains to advertisement issued for the post of Teacher Grade-III in the year 1998 by the Zila Parishad, Barmer. It is further submitted that as on date the impugned selection process is already over. Therefore, the present petition is rendered infructuous. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not refuted to the above said contentions. Considering the foregoing facts and circumstances, the present petitions are dismissed as rendered infructuous. Pending application(s), if any, shall stands disposed of. (SAMEER JAIN),J DIKSHA MISHRA /165-166