IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cr. M.P. 3175 of 2018 1. Swarnim Siddharth @ Swarnim Siddarth, aged about 17 years, Son of Deepak Kumar represented through his father and natural guardian Deepak Kumar, aged about 49 years, Son of Sri Harihar Pd. Singh, resident of Qr. No. D-18, Prof. Colony, NIT Campus, Adityapur, P.O. NIT, P.S.- RIT, District- Eash Singhbhum. 2. Ankit Kumar, aged about 17 years, Son of Rajesh Kumar, represented through his father and natural guardian Rajesh Kumar, aged about 47 years, Son of Late R.L.P. Yadav, resident of Block No. 4, Shastrinagar, Near Santoshi Mata Mandir, Kadma, P.O. & P.S.- Kadma, District- East Singhbhum. 3. Abhinav Sharma, aged about 18 years, Son of Barun Kumar Sharma, resident of N-1/51, Vatika Green City, Dimna Road Mango, P.O.M.G.M., P.S. Ulidh, District- East Singhbhum. ….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Kamta Prasad Singh, Son of Late Rameshwar Mandal, resident of Qr. No. B-28, Professor Colony, NIT Campus, P.O. NIT, P.S.-RIT, District- Saraikela, Kharsawan ….. Opp. Parties WITH Cr. Revision 1464 of 2018 1. Kamta Prasad Singh, aged about 42 years, Son of Late Rameshwar Mandal, resident of B-28 NIT Campus, Near Computer Centre, P.O.- RIT, Jamshedpur, P.S.-RIT, District- Saraikela, Kharsawan 2. Durga Das Banerjee, aged about 56 years, Son of Late Debnath Banerjee, resident of House No. 63, Padma Road, 10 No. Bastee, Jamshedpur, Golmuri, P.O. & P.S.- Golmuri, District- East Singhbhum. ….. Petitioners Versus 1. The State of Jharkhand 2. Abhinav Sharma, Son of Varun Sharma, resident of Vatika Green City, Dimna Road, Flat No. Saphire- 51, P.O.- M.G.M., P.S.- Ulidih, District- East Singhbhum. 3. Ankit Kumar, Son of Rajesh Kumar, resident of Shastrinagar, Block No. 4, Near Santoshi Mata Mandir, P.O. & P.S.- Kadma, District- East Singhbhum. 4. Swarnim Siddharth, Son of Deepak Kumar, resident of House No. D/18, NIT Campus, Adityapur-2, P.O. & P.S.-RIT, District- Seraikella, Kharsawana. ….. Opp. Parties --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRADEEP KUMAR SRIVASTAVA -------- For the Petitioners : Mrs. Jasvindar Mazumdar, Advocate. For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. For the O.P. No. 2 : Mr. Chandra G. A. Bardhan, Advocate. [In Cr.M.P. No. 3175 of 2018] For the Petitioners : Mr. Chandra G. A. Bardhan, Advocate. For the State : Mr. A.P. Topno, A.P.P. [In Cr. revision No. 1464 of 2018] --------- Order No. 06/Dated: 14th February, 2025 Cr. M.P. 3175 of 2018 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this criminal miscellaneous petition. 2. Permission is granted. 3. Accordingly, this criminal miscellaneous petition is dismissed as withdrawn. 4. Pending I.A., if any, stands disposed of. Cr. Revision 1464 of 2018 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned APP for the State. 6. In the present criminal revision, petitioner has challenged the order dated 27.04.2018 passed by learned Principal Magistrate Juvenile Justice Board, Seraikella in G.R. Case No. 660 of 2017 (R.I.T. P.S. Case No. 50 of 2017), whereby and whereunder the learned court in a haste had posted the case for hearing on 25.05.2018 without following the mandatory Provision of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015. 7. Learned APP for the State submits that the final order has also been passed in connection with the decision of juvenility of the petitioner and petitioner has also challenged the final order by filing in Criminal Revision No. 913/2024. 8. In view of the above facts and circumstances of this case, this revision appears to be infructuous. 9. Accordingly, this revision is dismissed as infructuous. (Pradeep Kumar Srivastava, J.) Simran/