Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24343 (JHR)

DEOLAL NAGESIA ALLIAS DEVLAL NAGESIA v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./8353/2025 · 2025-09-25

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:30054 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 8353 of 2025 ------ Deolal Nagesia @ Devlal Nagesia, aged about 44 years, son of late Somra Nagesia, resident of Village-Janhupat, P.O. & P.S.- Bihunpur, Dist.-Gumla … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anupam Anand, Advocate : Mr. Pranav Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Vandana Bharti, Addl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25.09.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with S.T. Case No. 93 of 2025 arising out of Bishunpur P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 103(1)/238 of the B.N.S., 2023. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed the murder of Shanti Devi, who was living with the petitioner as his wife after the death of his earlier husband, as the petitioner was her brother-in-law; by pushing her from the top of the hill. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and except suspicion and the confessional statement of the petitioner, there is no other material to implicate the petitioner in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 28.02.2025. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail. The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned A.S.J.-III, Gumla, in connection with S.T. Case No. 93 of 2025 arising out of Bishunpur P.S. Case No.06 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 25.09.2025 Sonu/Gunjan-