SREE ANUP GHOSH @ ANUP KUMARGHOSH v. THE STATE OF WEST BENGAL AND ORS.
WPA/11137/2025 · 2025-07-22
Tirthankar Ghosh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24342 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 24342 (CAL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sl.No. 8 DL Court No. 35 G.S.Das
22.07.2025
WPA 11137 of 2025
Sri Anup Ghosh @ Anup Kumar Ghosh -Vs- The State of West Bengal & Ors.
Mr. Bellal Shaikh
… for the State-respondent(s)
Re
The writ petition has been preferred as the petitioner felt insecurity in respect of protection of his life and property. The petitioner has earlier approached this court by way of WPA 28460 of 2022.
As none appears on behalf of the State, Mr. Bellal Shaikh, learned advocate, who ordinarily appears on behalf of the State is directed to represent the State. His appearance may be regularised by the concerned authority.
Having regard to the core issue as contained in the writ petition, primarily, I find that the dispute relates to
demarcation of the property, as such, the same do not call for any interference of this Court as the same is a private dispute.
However, the police authorities would only oversee that no untoward incident results because of the strained relationship existing between the parties.
With the aforesaid observations, WPA 11137 of 2025 is disposed of.
Pending application(s), if any, is also disposed of.
Parties to act on a server copy of this order duly collected from the official website of the Hon’ble High Court, Calcutta.
(Tirthankar Ghosh, J.)