Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24341 (RAJ)

SHANKAR LAL JAT S/O SHRI HEERLAL JAT v. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE

CW/10529/2025 · 2025-07-16

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:26478] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No.10529/2025 1. Shankar Lal Jat S/o Shri Heerlal Jat, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Jato Ka Mohalla, Chourupura, Lawa, District Tonk. 2. Mukesh Choudhary S/o Shri Shoji Ram Choudhary, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Ward No. 19, Jato Ka Mohalla, Gram Chourupura, Tehsil Malpura, Lawa District Tonk. ----Petitioners Versus 1. The Principal Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Government Of Rajasthan, Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. District Collector Cum Chairman Plpc, Tonk Rajasthan. 3. Sub Divisional Magistrate, Malpura District Tonk. 4. Tehsildar Malpura, District Tonk. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Laxmi Kant Malpura JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 16/07/2025 1. After arguing the matter for some time, counsel for the petitioners submits that a liberty be granted to the petitioners to file a representation before the respondents for redressal of their grievances and the authority concerned be also directed to decide the representation of the petitioners, expeditiously as early as possible preferably within a time frame. 2. Considering the aforesaid statement made by the counsel for the petitioners, the instant writ petition stands disposed of with liberty aforesaid. In case, any representation is submitted by the [2025:RJ-JP:26478] (2 of 2) [CW-10529/2025] petitioners, the respondents are expected to hear and decide the same expeditiously as early as possible. 3. Stay application and all pending application(s), if any, also stand dismissed. 4. Before parting with this order, it is made clear that this Court has not issued any order or direction to the respondents to decide the representation of the petitioners in a particular manner. They would be at liberty to decide the same strictly in accordance with law. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J Karan/52