Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24340 (RAJ)

RAJENDRA @ RAJU S/O SHRI HAJARILAL v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/8983/2025 · 2025-08-25

Praveer Bhatnagar

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:33578] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 8983/2025 Rajendra @ Raju S/o Shri Hajarilal, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Gola Basti Tan Kote, Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli (Rajasthan). (Accused Petitioner Presently Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. D.K. Dixit, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR Order 25/08/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. on behalf of accused-petitioner. The accused-petitioner has been arrested in connection with FIR No.63/2025, registered at Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli, for the offence(s) under Sections 8/21 of the N.D.P.S. Act. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the accused- petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that the alleged quantity recovered from the petitioner’s possession is around 74.83 grams of smack which is below commercial quantity. It is also contended that the accused- petitioner is in custody since 13.06.2025, there are no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and the charge-sheet has already been submitted and trial of the case may take [2025:RJ-JP:33578] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-8983/2025] considerable time, therefore, the bail application of the accused- petitioner may be allowed. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of bail application. 4. Heard and perused the material available on the record. 5. Considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner and so also the fact that the alleged quantity of contraband article recovered from the possession of the petitioner is below commercial quantity, there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioner and the charge-sheet has already been submitted and the trial of the case may take considerable time, therefore, without expressing anything on the merits of the case, this Court deems it proper to enlarge the accused-petitioner on bail. 6. Accordingly, the bail application under Section 483 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that the accused petitioner- Rajendra @ Raju S/o Shri Hajarilal, in connection with FIR No.63/2025, registered at Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli, shall be enlarged on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Judge for his appearance before the Court concerned on all the dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. (PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava /-128