MINOR (MOHAMMAD ZOYAB ALIAS ZUHEB) v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND
ABA/161/2025 · 2025-02-17
Ravindra Maithani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2434 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2434 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
ABA No.161 of 2025 Hon’ble Ravindra Maithani, J. Mr. Basant Singh, Advocate holding brief of Mr. Harshpal Sekhon, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Akshay Latwal, Brief Holder for the State. Applicant is a Child in Conflict with Law. He seeks anticipatory bail in FIR No.47 of 2025, under Sections 109, 115(2), 118(1), 190, 191(2), 191(3), 351(3), 352 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2025, Police Station Kichha, District Udham Singh Nagar. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record. In view of the judgment passed by this Court in the case of Rashid Rao Vs. State of Uttarakhand, 2022 SCC OnLine Utt 481, in ABA No.52 of 2022, the anticipatory bail application is not maintainable. The anticipatory bail application stands disposed of, accordingly.
(Ravindra Maithani J.)
17.02.2025 RV