SATISH SHAMRAO KALE v. THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER
CA/4567/2026 · 2026-07-22
Shri Ajit B Kadethankar, Shri Kishore C Sant
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2434 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 2434 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 1 )
38 WP 5235 OF 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 38 WRIT PETITION NO. 5235 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4567 OF 2026 IN WP/5235/2025 SATISH SHAMRAO KALE VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 5874 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4569 OF 2026 IN WP/5874/2025 SINDHU CHANDRAKANT KADAM VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND ANOTHER ... Mr. C. R. Thorat, Advocate for the Petitioner Mr. R. S. Wani, AGP for Respondent No.1 – State Mr. S. S. Dambe, Advocate for Respondent No.2 AND WRIT PETITION NO.13451 OF 2025 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3580 OF 2026 IN WP/13451/2025 PRAKASH SAMBHAJI BEDKEWAD VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY AND OTHERS … Mr. C. R. Thorat, Advocate for Petitioner Mr. S. B. Pulkundwar, AGP for Respondent /State 2026:BHC-AUG:30626-DB
( 2 )
38 WP 5235 OF 2025 … CORAM : KISHORE C. SANT AND AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, JJ. DATE : 22.07.2026 PER COURT :- . Writ Petition No.13451 of 2025 and Civil Application No.3580 of 2026 are not on board. Taken on board. 2. Considering the prayers and reliefs sought in the Petitions, this Court finds that the Petitions can be conveniently disposed off. 3. This Court in Writ Petition Nos.303/2025, 266/2025 and 1375/2025 has already passed the order. Both the parties accept to the said position. 4. It is the case of the Petitioners that the proposal of tribe validity certificate is still pending with the Scrutiny Committee. Pending said proposal, the Petitioner stood super-annuated. The State Government by Government Resolution dated 14.12.2022 created supernumerary posts in respect of such of the Government employees who have faced invalidation, directing them to be transferred to such supernumerary posts and they have been held entitled to have all the pensionary benefits. However, they are not entitled to benefit of promotion and the policy of compassionate appointment. ( 3 )
38 WP 5235 OF 2025
5. In said orders, this Court further relied upon two judgments whereby such employees were permitted not to press their proposals before the Scrutiny Committee and a direction was issued extending all the pensionary benefits. 6.
In view of the above, the Petitions stand disposed off with following order :- a. The Petitioners shall file affidavit before the Scrutiny Committee and the Committee shall permit them not to press the proposals within two weeks. b. On such compliance being made the Respondent/Zilla Parishad shall process Petitioners’ pension papers and extend all the pensionary benefits. 7. Pending Civil Applications, if any, stand disposed of. ( AJIT B. KADETHANKAR, J. ) ( KISHORE C. SANT, J. ) PRW