Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24337 (AP)

Banisetti Mohanarao v. Grandhi Savitramma

SA/287/2007 · 2025-01-07

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010343702007 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] TUESDAY ,THE SEVENTH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 287/2007 Between: Banisetti Mohanarao ...APPELLANT AND Grandhi Savitramma ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. K PURUSHOTHAM Counsel for the Respondent: 1. The Court made the following JUDGMENT: 1. This Second Appeal was filed by the appellant/defendant under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (for short, 'C.P.C.') against the Judgment and decree, dated 17.10.2006 passed in A.S.No.14 of 2006 on the file of learned Senior Civil Judge’s Court at Rajam, confirming the judgment and decree, dated 20.12.2005 passed in O.S.No.127 of 1998 on the file of learned Junior Civil Judge’s Court at Rajam. 2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing in the morning session, no representation on behalf of the appellant. The matter was subsequently passed over at 2.15 P.M. 3. In the afternoon session also, there was no representation on behalf of the appellant despite listing the matter under the caption ‘for dismissal’. It seems that the appellant is not evincing any interest to prosecute with the appeal. 4. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. However, there shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. _____________________________ JUSTICE T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO Date:07.01.2025 MS THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE T.MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO.287 OF 2007 Date:07.01.2025 MS