Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24335 (CHH)

PUNIT RAM DESHMUKH v. THE UNION OF INDIA

WPC/3060/2025 · 2025-06-19

Shri Arvind Kumar Verma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:26039 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 3060 of 2025 1 - Punit Ram Deshmukh S/o Shri Lt. Shri Bhagwat Prashad Deshmukh Aged About 53 Years At Present Society Manager Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadi Somatola R.N. No. 1101, Paddy Procurement Center Somatola, Address Village Jiratola Post Dumatola, Tehsil Mohala, District : Mohla-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - The Union Of India Through Secretary Co-Operative, Atal Akshay Urja Bhawan, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, Behind N.I.A. Building, New Delhi. 2 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Co-Operative, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Secretary Department Of Food And Civil Suppliers, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 4 - The Manager Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited Office At 6th Floor Tower-C, Commercial Complex C.B.D. Sector 21, Atal Nagar District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 492002 5 - The Collector Mohala-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, District Mohala-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh. 6 - The District Marketing Officer Mohala-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, District Mohala- 2 Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh. 7 - The Chief Executive Officer District Cooperative Central Bank Maryadit Rajnandgaon, District : Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh 8 - The Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society Mohala-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, District Mohala-Manpur-Ambagarh Chowki, Chhattisgarh. --- Respondent(s) For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Shivam Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No. 1 For State For Respondent No. 4 & 6 For Respondent No. 7 : Mr. Ramakant Mishra, DSGI along with Mr. Bhupendra Pandey, Advocate Mr. Mayur Khandelwal, Panel Lawyers Mr. Harshal Chouhan, Advocate Ms. Priyanka Rai on behalf of Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 20/06/2025 1. With the consent of the learned counsel for the respective parties, the matter is heard finally. 2. The present writ petitions have been filed by the petitioners praying for the following relief(s): “10.1 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by commanding and directing the respondent’s authority to lift the paddy from procurement centers forthwith as per the number of bags. 10.2 That, the Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent authority to 3 comply the terms and condition of the policy and agreement which relates to lifting of paddy within prescribed period. 10.3 That this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ by commanding and directing the respondent’s authority to pay the all expenses made by the petitioner to keep the paddy in safe. 10.4 That the respondents may kindly be directed to provide the benefit of loss of paddy due to driage and change of climates in light of clarification letter dated 12.11.2024 as well as letter dated 25.02.2025. 10.5 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to direct the respondent to consider and decide the representation of petitioner in light of the order passed by this Hon’ble Court in similar cases. 10.6 Any other relief which the Hon’ble Court may deem fit, in the interest of justice.” 3. Since the identical issue is involved in all the writ petitions, as such, they are being heard and disposed of together by this common order. This order will adjudicate the entire bunch of the writ petitions. 4. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court vide its order dated 12.06.2025 in WPC No. 2691 of 2025 (Yadavram Janghel Vs. The Union of India and others), therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of Yadavram Janghel (supra). 4 5. Learned Counsels for the respondents raised no objection. 6. Accordingly, the present bunch of writ petitions are disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Yadavram Janghel (supra). 7. A copy of the order passed in Yadavram Janghel (supra) be placed in the record of the present writ petition. Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE Madhurima