Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24334 (JHR)

REENA MANDAL v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

A.B.A./5901/2024 · 2025-05-01

Sri Ananda Sen

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2025:JHHC:13252 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.5901 of 2024 ------ 1. Reena Mandal 2. Dinesh Kumar Mandal … … Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand. … … Opposite Party ------ CORAM : SRI ANANDA SEN, J. ------ For the Petitioner(s) : Mr. R.S. Mazumdar, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Pratiush Lala, Advocate For the State : Mr. Sardhu Mahto, A.P.P. ----- 09/ 01.05.2025 Heard the parties. 2. This anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita (BNSS), 2023, has been preferred by the petitioners apprehending their arrest in connection with Dhanbad P.S. Case No.301 of 2024, for offences under Sections 341, 342, 307, 323, 324, 325 and 34 IPC. The case is presently pending before the Court of learned C.J.M. Dhanbad. 3. Learned A.P.P. representing the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail. 4. There is a direct allegation against the petitioners of assaulting the injured. The assault was such that the injuries are grievous and there is fracture on the vital part of the body. It is further alleged that hot water was thrown on the injured, as a result of which there was severe damage and the skin got pilled off. The informant and petitioner No.2 are own brothers. 5. Considering the nature of allegation and the injury, this Court does not find it a fit case to enlarge these petitioners on anticipatory bail. 2025:JHHC:13252 2 6. Accordingly, this Anticipatory Bail Application stands dismissed. 7. If the petitioners surrender, the Court below will consider the case on its own merit and also taking into consideration the result of the case and counter case filed by the petitioners. (ANANDA SEN, J.) Prashant. Cp-3