Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24327 (GAU)

KHALIL UDDIN MAZUMDER v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS.

WP(C)/6448/2025 · 2025-11-16

Devashis Baruah

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010245232025 2025:GAU-AS:15530 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : WP(C)/6448/2025 KHALIL UDDIN MAZUMDER S/O MOIN UDDIN MAZUMDER, R/O VILL- MOHANPUR PART-II, P.O.- KATIRAIL, P.S.- KATIGORAH, DIST- CACHAR, PIN-788804 VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND 7 ORS. REPRESENTED BY THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM, PUBLIC WORKS (ROADS) DEPARTMENT, DISPUR, GUWAHATI-6 2:THE CHIEF SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 3:THE COMMISSIONER AND SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT OF ASSAM FINANCE (ESTABLISHMENT-B) DEPARTMENT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 4:THE CHIEF ENGINEER PUBLIC WORKS (ROADS) DEPARTMENT ASSAM CHANDMARI GUWAHATI-3 5:THE SPECIAL COMMISSIONER PUBLIC WORKS (ROADS) DEPARTMENT ASSAM DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 Page No.# 2/3 6:THE SECRETARY TO THE HONORABLE CHIEF MINISTER OF ASSAM CHIEF MINISTERS SECRETARIAT DISPUR GUWAHATI-6 7:THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER PWRD KATIGORAH AND BORKHOLA TERRITORIAL ROAD DIVISION SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-788001 8:THE DISTRICT COMMISSIONER CACHAR P.O.- SILCHAR DIST- CACHAR ASSAM PIN-78800 For the petitioner (s) : Mr. S. B.Laskar, Advocate For the respondent (s) : Mr. B. Gogoi, SC, PWD (Roads) Mr. G. Bokalial, Govt. Advocate BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEVASHIS BARUAH O R D E R 17.11.2025 Heard Mr. S. B. Laskar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner. Mr. G. Bokalial, the learned Government Advocate appears on behalf of the State respondents and Mr. B. Gogoi, the learned counsel appears on behalf of the PWD (Roads). Page No.# 3/3 2. Mr. S. B. Laskar, the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that the petitioner would be well advised to approach the appropriate forum rather than pursing the present writ petition, and as such, he would like to withdraw the instant writ petition. 3. Taking into account the above, the instant writ petition stands closed on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant