Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 24319 (PNJ)

NIC v. DARSHANA RANI ETC

FAO/557/1993 · 2025-04-03

Vikas Bahl

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 108-2 FAO-557-1993 Decided on:03.04.2025 National Insurance Company Ltd. . . . Appellant Versus Darshana and others . . . Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS BAHL PRESENT: Mr. Suvir Dewan, Advocate for the appellant. Mr. Sukhjinder Singh, Advocate and Ms. Navneet Kaur, Advocate for respondent No.1. Mr. Abhishek Jindal, Advocate for Mr. Nandan Jindal, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr.Ravinder Arora, Advocate for the respondent-New India Insurance Company. ***** VIKAS BAHL, J.(ORAL) 1. Learned counsel for the appellant, at the outset, has fairly submitted that he seeks to withdraw the present appeal. 2. In view of the above, present appeal is dismissed as withdrawn. (VIKAS BAHL) 03.04.2025 JUDGE Mehak Whether reasoned/speaking? Yes/No Whether reportable? Yes/No MEHAK HURIA 2025.04.04 13:57 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment