1 / 3 2025:CGHC:23988 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2846 of 2025 Shekh Rahmantula Kureshi S/o Shekh Rustam Kureshi Aged About 43 Years At Present Society Manager Adim Jati Seva Sahkari Samiti Maryadit Rengakathera R.N. No. 11, Paddy Procurement Center Rengakathera Add- Village Rengakathera Post Rengakathera, Tehsil Mohala Dist. Mohala- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) ... Petitioner versus 1 - The Union of India Through Secretary Co-Operative, Atal Aksahy Urja Bhawan, C.G.O. Complex, Lodhi Road, Behind NIA Building, New Delhi 2 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Co-Operative, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 3 - The Secretary Department Of Food And Civil Suppliers Mahanadi Bhawan, Matralaya, Atal Nagar, Raipur, District Raipur (C.G.) 4 - The Manager Chhattisgarh State Cooperative Marketing Federation Limited Office At 6th Floor Tower- C Commercial Complex CBD Sector 21, Atal Nagar, District Raipur, C.G. 492002 5 - The Collector Mohala- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki District Mohala- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) 6 - The District Marketing Officer Mohala- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki District Mohala- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) 7 - The Chief Executive Officer District Cooperative Central Bank Maryadit Rajnandgaon District Rajnandgaon (C.G.) 8 - The Deputy Registrar Cooperative Society Mohala- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki Dist. Mohala- Manpur- Ambagarh Chowki (C.G.) ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.06.20 11:46:12 +0530 2 / 3 ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Shivam Mishra, Advocate For Respondent No.1/UOI : Mr. Bhupendra Pandey and Mr. Tushar Dhar Diwan, CGC For State : Mr. Rishabh Bisen, PL For Respondents No.4 & 6 : Mr. Harshal Chauhan, Advocate For Respondent No.7 : Ms. Priyanka Rai, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. Shashank Thakur, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 13/06/2025 1. At the very outset, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that the issue involved in the present writ petition has already been considered and decided by this Court in W.P.(C) No.2691 of 2025 {Yadavram Janghel Vs. The Union of India and others} and other connected matters, therefore, this writ petition may be disposed of in terms of Yadavram Janghel (supra). 2. Learned State counsel has no objection. 3. Accordingly, the present writ petition is disposed of in terms of the order passed by this Court in Yadavram Janghel (supra). 4. A copy of the order passed in Yadavram Janghel (supra) be placed in the record of the present writ petition. Sd/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu 3 / 3