Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010344072023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3505] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FIRST DAY OF JULY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1884/2023 Between:
1. KANITHI KIRAN, S/O GANGA PRASAD, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC. SOLUTION INTEGRATOR ERICSSON INDIA GLOBAL SERVICES PVT. LTD., R/O. 8TH FLOOR, BLOCK-C, SP INFO CITY 40, MGR SALAI, KANDANCHAVADI, PERUGUDI, CHENNAI 600 096, TAMIL NADU.
...PETITIONER AND
1. KANITHIRAMBHA SOWMITHRI DEVI, W/O KIRAN, D/O R.SANTHI PRASAD, AGED 33 YEARS, C/O. SRI R.SANTHI PRASAD, FLAT NO.205, D.NO.1-62-35/12, VAISAKHI ENCLAVE, SECTOR-IL MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM 530 017.
2. KANITHIVAIKHUN SAI, S/O KANITHI KIRAN AND SMT. K SOW-MITHRI DEVI, AGED 2 YEARS, BEING MINOR REP. BY HIS NATURAL MOTHER KANITHI (RAMBHA) SAWMITHRI DEVI, W/O KIRAN, D/O R.SANTHI PRASAD, AGED 33 YEARS, RIO. SRI R.SANTHI PRASAD, FLAT NO.205, D.NO.1-62-35/12, VAISAKHI ENCLAVE,
SECTOR-11, MVP COLONY, VISAKHAPATNAM- 530 017.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased tobegs to present this Memorandum of Civil Revision Petition against the Order dated 09.04.2023 passed in I.A No 936/2019 in FCOP No 739/2018, on the file of Hon'ble Additional Family Court Visakhapatnam IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to stay the older dated 09.04.2023 passed in I.A No 936/2019 in F COP No 739/2018. on the file of Hon' ble Additional Family Court Visakhapatnam and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. TEKKALI DILLESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. The Court made the following:
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D.SEKHAR CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 1884 of 2023 ORDER:
When the matter was listed on 14.07.2025, there was no representation for the petitioner. Even, today also there is no representation for the petitioner. It shows that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case.
2. In that view of the matter, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs.
3. As a sequel, Miscellaneous Petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
_____________________ JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
Dt: 21.07.2025 sj
176 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T.C.D. SEKHAR
CRP No.1884 of 2023
Date 21.07.2025
sj