1 APHC010343552014 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] FRIDAY ,THE FOURTEENTH DAY OF FEBRUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 30970/2014 Between: Donthala Appala Narasamma and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND Vizianagaram Municipality and Others ...RESPONDENT(S) Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. VENKATESWARA RAO GUDAPATI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B D MAHESWARA REDDY 2. GP FOR REVENUE (AP) 3. The Court made the following: 2 ORDER : This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “....to issue an order, direction or writ more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent authorities in trying to demolish and evict the petitioners from their residential buildings in Door No.8-18-198, Routhu Veedhi, Devi Centre, VT Agraharam, D.No.8-18-1052/3, Ganesh Nagar, D.No.8- 18-1052/3 Ganesh Nagar, D.No.8-18-831, Ganesh Nagar in Vizianagaram respectively without issuing any notice or following due process of law as arbitrary, illegal, null and void, against norms of public policy, principles of natural justice and violative of fundamental rights guaranteed under Constitution of India and to issue consequential direction directing the respondent authorities not to demolish the buildings of the petitioners constructed in pursuance of the possession certificates issued by the 2nd respondent authority…” 2. At the time of admission of this writ petition on 16.10.2014, this Court passed the following interim order:- “…Having regard to the fact that 2nd respondent had issued Possession Certificate to the petitioners recognizing their possession of the subject property in 2007, there shall be an interim direction as prayed for restraining the respondents from interfering with the 3 possession and enjoyment of the petitioners from the subject property without following the due process of law.” 3. In view of the above, this Court feels it appropriate to make the interim order as final order. 4. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of by making the interim order dated 16.10.2014 as final order. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date: 14.02.2025 JLV